Critical Thinking Exam 2

About this set

Created by:

jpanderson  on March 22, 2012

Log in to favorite or report as inappropriate.
Pop out
No Messages

You must log in to discuss this set.

Critical Thinking Exam 2

Categorical Syllogism
A syllogism in which the premises and conclusion describe the relationship between two categories by using statements that begin with all, no, or some.
1/20
Preview our new flashcards mode!

Study:

Cards

Speller

Learn

Test

Scatter

Games:

Scatter

Space Race

Tools:

Export

Copy

Combine

Embed

Order by

Terms

Definitions

Categorical Syllogism A syllogism in which the premises and conclusion describe the relationship between two categories by using statements that begin with all, no, or some.
Disjunctive Syllogism A or B
Not A
Therefore, B
Dilemma a choice between two unpleasant or difficult options
Reducto ad absurdum Definition: "leads to an absurd concept".
Deductive Reasoning reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case (The sun rises every morning; therefore, the sun will rise on Tuesday morning.)
Inductive Reasoning deriving general principles from particular facts or instances ("Every cat I have ever seen has four legs; cats are four-legged animals").
Inductive generalization argument that takes a sample and implies that about the whole.
analogy a comparison of two different things that are similar in some way
reasoning from cause Inferring that a known fact or event (effect) was the result of a particular event (cause) that occurred earlier
reasoning from sign uses an observable mark or sign as proof for the existence of problem
Fallacies errors in reasoning
Hasty Generalization an error in reasoning from specific instances, in which a speaker jumps to a general conclusion on the basis of insufficient evidence
post hoc ergo propter hoc Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident
False Analogy the two objects or events being compared are relevantly dissimilar
Begging the question assuming something to be true that really needs proof
Red Herring any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue
Ad Hominem in an argument, this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas.
False Dichotomy argues there are only two options when really there may be many
Badwagon A fallacy that assumes that because something is popular, it is therefore good, correct, or desirable.
Slippery Slope A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented

First Time Here?

Welcome to Quizlet, a fun, free place to study. Try these flashcards, find others to study, or make your own.

Set Champions

Scatter Champion

32.5 secs by jpanderson 

Completed “Learn” mode

jpanderson