English 101A - Logical Fallacies

About this set

Created by:

Racheldeguzman  on April 16, 2012

Subjects:

English101A

Description:

Vocab

Log in to favorite or report as inappropriate.
Pop out
No Messages

You must log in to discuss this set.

English 101A - Logical Fallacies

Hasty Generalization
draws conclusions from too little evidence
1/9
Preview our new flashcards mode!

Study:

Cards

Speller

Learn

Test

Scatter

Games:

Scatter

Space Race

Tools:

Export

Copy

Combine

Embed

Order by

Terms

Definitions

Hasty Generalization draws conclusions from too little evidence
False analogy Comparing 1 person, event or issue from another = confusing
Begging the question repeats the question in different words.
Non sequitur describes a conclusion that does not logically follow
Oversimplification offer easy solutions for complicated problems
Emotionally loaded terms tries to sway the readers by using emotionally charged words
Ad Hominem rejects the opposing views by attacking the person who holds them
Faulty cause and effect the fact that one event precedes another in time does not mean the 1st event caused the second
Either/or reasoning unwillingness to recognize complexity. (uses either/or, offers only 2 solutions.)

First Time Here?

Welcome to Quizlet, a fun, free place to study. Try these flashcards, find others to study, or make your own.

Set Champions

There are no high scores or champions for this set yet. You can sign up or log in to be the first!