Amendment 4 - 14

About this set

Created by:

bri2winnie  on March 11, 2010

Subjects:

AP Government and Politics

Log in to favorite or report as inappropriate.
Pop out
No Messages

You must log in to discuss this set.

Amendment 4 - 14

Illinois v Wardlow
4 - Reasonable suspicion permits the police to search and seizure
1/36
Preview our new flashcards mode!

Study:

Cards

Speller

Learn

Test

Scatter

Games:

Scatter

Space Race

Tools:

Export

Copy

Combine

Embed

Order by

Terms

Definitions

Illinois v Wardlow 4 - Reasonable suspicion permits the police to search and seizure
Kyllo v United States 4 - Thermal imaging of a home may be done only with a warrant
Mapp v Ohio 4 - Obscene Materials found - Evidence obtained without a warrant may not be used in criminal prosecutions
New Jersey v T.L.O. 4 - School officials may search without a warrant using reasonable suspicion or a violation of school rules
Olmstead v United States 4 - Wiretap with a warrant
United States v Leon 4 - Evidence obtained in good faith may be used in a criminal trial
Dred Scott v Sanford 5 - States do not have the right to claim an individuals property - Overturned Missouri Compromise
Miranda v Arizona 5 - Law officials have to address their rights
Kelo v New London Connecticut 5 - The government can take property from someone for 'public use'
Betts v Brady 6 - Due process is not interrupted just because you don't recieve council - No right to council, if illiterate
Escobedo v Illinois 6 - When being questioned, a person has the right to an attorney
Gideon v Wainwrite 6 - Overruled Betts v Brady, Courts are required to provide attorneys for defendents who are unable to afford their own
Powell v Alabama 6 - The defendent must be given acces to council upon his or her request as part of due process - death penalty
Furman v Georgia 8 - no racial imbalance - death penalty is UNconstitutional
Gregg v Georgia 8 - Death penalty IS constitutional
Ingraham v Wright 8 - Corpral punishment IS constitutional
Wilkins v Missouri 8 - Death penalty 16+
Bowers v Hardwick 9 - Sodonomy laws are fine
Griswold v Connecticut 9 - Right to privacy
Roe v Wade 9 - Crime to get an abortion
Romer v Evans 9 - Can't have an exclusion law
Stenberg v Carhart 9 - Partial birth abortion is legal
Bakke v University of California 14 - White man - no quota- supports affirmative action
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 14 - A private organization is allowed to exclude a person from membership
Brown v Board of Education 14 - Seperate but equal unconstitutional - outlaw segregation
Civil Rights Cases of 1883 14 - The court held that the Civil Rights Act of 1875 was unconstitutional
Cruzan v Missouri 14 - Creates living will
Fargher v City of Boca Raton 14 - Sexual harassment
Goss v Lopez 14 - hearing before suspended from school
In Re Gault 14 - right of jouvenille court system
Plessy v Ferguson 14 - sets up separate but equal
Rostker v Goldberg 14 - Congress can draft men without drafting women
Sheppard v Maxwell 14 - gag order on the media - trail can be moved
Swann v Mecklenburg School District 14 - Courts can bus students for integration
Troxel v Granville 14 - grandparents have no control
Washington v Glucksberg 14 - Assisted suicide - unconstitutional

First Time Here?

Welcome to Quizlet, a fun, free place to study. Try these flashcards, find others to study, or make your own.

Set Champions

There are no high scores or champions for this set yet. You can sign up or log in to be the first!