NAME

Question types


Start with


Question limit

of 12 available terms

Advertisement Upgrade to remove ads
Print test

4 Written questions

4 Multiple choice questions

  1. (1944) the Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states, and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
  2. (1966) Ernesto Miranda confesses to raping a girl, but wasn't made aware of his protection in the bill of rights. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
  3. (1976) "Hot Pursuit" clause made, meaning evidence is admissible if found during hot pursuit.
  4. (1984) If effort to get a legitimate warrant was made in "good faith" then evidence is admissible.

4 True/False questions

  1. Maryland v Garrison(1987) "Honest Mistake" clause made when drugs were found with a warrant for a different location, but unintentionally.

          

  2. Nix v Williams(1984) The evidence pertaining to the discovery and condition of the victim's body was properly admitted at respondent's second trial on the ground that it would ultimately or inevitably have been discovered even if no violation of any constitutional provision had taken place.

          

  3. Mapp v Ohio(1961) Person is searched and the cops find pornography(against Ohio law), but court found the evidence inadmissible. Exclusionary rule had to be binding on all state cases.

          

  4. Escobedo v Illinois(1984) The evidence pertaining to the discovery and condition of the victim's body was properly admitted at respondent's second trial on the ground that it would ultimately or inevitably have been discovered even if no violation of any constitutional provision had taken place.

          

Create Set