4 Written Questions
4 Multiple Choice Questions
- (1966) Ernesto Miranda confesses to raping a girl, but wasn't made aware of his protection in the bill of rights. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
- (1976) "Hot Pursuit" clause made, meaning evidence is admissible if found during hot pursuit.
- (1984) If effort to get a legitimate warrant was made in "good faith" then evidence is admissible.
- (1999) Made "in plain view" rule. Guys bagging coke next to a window where a cop saw them.
4 True/False Questions
Florida v JL → (1976) "Hot Pursuit" clause made, meaning evidence is admissible if found during hot pursuit.
Maryland v Garrison → (1987) "Honest Mistake" clause made when drugs were found with a warrant for a different location, but unintentionally.
Escobedo v Illinois → (1984) The evidence pertaining to the discovery and condition of the victim's body was properly admitted at respondent's second trial on the ground that it would ultimately or inevitably have been discovered even if no violation of any constitutional provision had taken place.
Weeks v US → (1914) Established exclusionary rule, evidence gotten without a warrant isn't admissable in a federal court