Flashcards: LSAT Act Types

About these flashcards

Created by:

hondaredrider42 on August 29, 2010

Subjects:

lsat

Description:

LSAT Question Type Act

Log in to favorite or report as inappropriate.
Pop out
No Messages

You must log in to discuss this set.

Flashcards: LSAT Act Types

Main Point
•Identify the conclusions and premises.

•Use the Why Test and then match your conclusion against
the five answer choices.

•Be careful not to fall for the opposite.

•When down to two choices, look for extreme wording and
relevance to eliminate one choice.
1/11

Study:

Speller

Learn

Test

Play Games:

Scatter

Space Race

Terms

Definitions

Main Point•Identify the conclusions and premises.

•Use the Why Test and then match your conclusion against
the five answer choices.

•Be careful not to fall for the opposite.

•When down to two choices, look for extreme wording and
relevance to eliminate one choice.
Necessary Assumption•Identify the conclusion, premises, and assumptions of the
author.

•If you're having trouble finding the assumption, look for a gap
between two different ideas in the argument.

•The assumption will always strengthen the author's
conclusion and is NECESSARY for the conclusion to follow
from the information provided.

•When down to two choices, negate each statement to see if
the argument falls apart. If it does, that's your answer.
Sufficient Assumption•Identify the conclusion, premises, and assumptions of the
author.

•Look for language in the conclusion that is not accounted for
in the premise.

•Paraphrase an answer that would strongly connect the
premises to the conclusion and shore up the language gap.

•Eliminate answer choices that bring in new information.
Weaken•Identify the conclusion, premises, and assumptions of the
author.

•Read critically, looking for where the author made large leaps
in logic.

•Then, when you go to the answer choices, look for a choice
that has the most negative impact on the leap in logic.

•Assume all choices to be hypothetically true.
Strengthen•Identify the conclusion, premises, and assumptions of the
author.

•Read critically, looking for where the author made large leaps
in logic.

•Then, when you go to the answer choices, look for a choice
that has the most positive impact on that gap.

•Assume all choices to be hypothetically true.
Resolve/Explain •Identify the apparent discrepancy or paradox.

•Go to the answer choices and look for a piece of information
that, when added to the argument, allows both facts from the
argument to be true.

•Assume all choices to be hypothetically true.
Inference•Read carefully, paying close attention to qualifying language,
and then go to the answer choices.

•Once there, cross off any answer choices that are not
directly supported by evidence in the passage.

•Look for relevance and extreme language to eliminate answer
choice.

•Use the contrapositive if there are "if...then" statements
contained in the passage and in the answer choices.
Reasoning•Read the arguments carefully and then describe what is
happening in your own words, focusing on the author's
conclusion and premises.

•Take this description and rigorously apply it to all the answer
choices.

•Once you're at the answer choice, use the technique of
comparing the actions described in the answer choices
against those that actually occur in the arguments.

•Cross out anything that didn't appear in the argument.
Flaw•Break down the argument into its parts; the flaw is usually
related to an assumption.

•State in your own word what the problem with the argument
is.

•With each answer, try to match the actions described in the
answer choices with those of the argument itself. Look for
the choice that has the same problem you found.

•Eliminate the answers that don't match; look for the answer
that addresses the assumption.
Principle Match•Make sure you know in which direction the argument flows.
Are you being asked to find a principle that conforms to a
situation, or a situation that conforms to a principle?

•Once you're sure, look for an answer that most closely
matches the general principle underlying the argument.
Parallel-the-Reasoning•Parallel-the-Reasoning questions will either contain flawed or
valid reasoning, and the question will tip you off.

•Try to diagram the argument and then diagram each of the
answer choices, comparing each one to the diagram you
came up with for the argument itself.

•If the argument is flawed, be careful not to choose an answer
that fixes it.

•Save Parallel-the-Reasoning questions for LAST.

Set Champions

There are no high scores or champions for this set yet. You can sign up or log in to be the first!