5 Written Questions
5 Matching Questions
- perceptual equivalence
- quasi-picture view
- parallel processing
- transformational equivalence
- a -imaging is like seeing (with a "mind's eye"); the same 'visual screen' is used
1. Perky's (1910) tomato/leaf/banana experiment
2. Farah (1985), like Perky (1910), found that Ss found it easier to perceive a low-contrast letter (an H or a T) if they had been imaging that letter.
- b -The processing of several aspects of a problem simultaneously; the brain's natural mode of information processing for many functions, including vision. Contrasts with the step-by-step (serial) processing of most computers and of conscious problem solving. (Myers Psychology 8e p. 210)
- c (Shepard, Kosslyn, Finke)
-mental images are Analog/ Geometric representations of visual stimuli; and are "functional isomorphs" to Euclidean space (Shepard)
-*visual imaging is functionally equivalent to seeing, with our "mind's eye"
- d -Images leave out significant details, and cannot be re-analyzed for those details the way that pictures can.
*E.g., image of a tiger does not specify an exact number of stripes
- e -images can be scanned, rotated, etc. in the same way as actual pictures or spatial stimuli
E.g., "mentally" walking around one's house
1. Mental Rotation
a. Letter Rotation
--when NOT told to use imagery (Cooper & Shepard, 1973)
***pictured: normal F and rotated F***
--when told explicitly to use imagery (Cooper, 1976): start rotating figure; closer the second letter was to calculated orientation, faster the RT.
b. Block Figures Rotation in 2- and 3-dimensions (Shepard & Metzler, 1971)
***pictured: 3D block configurations***
c. Polygon rotation independent of stimulus complexity (Cooper, 1975)
5 Multiple Choice Questions
- -spatial relations can be implicitly represented in a picture/ image (without explicit attention ever having been paid to the spatial relations).
- -a mental representation that mirrors or resembles the thing it represents; mental images can occur in many and perhaps all sensory modalities
- -A term used in logic to describe the content of assertions. Assertions are non-linguistic abstractions from sentences and can be evaluated as either true or false.
-The nature of ____________ is highly controversial amongst philosophers, many of whom are skeptical about the existence of _____________.
-Many logicians prefer to avoid use of the term, in favour of using sentences
- States that imagery is like perception, in that images retain some of the sensory qualities of perception.
-There is a more or less direct relationship between representation and referent.
-Spatial relationships are also directly captured.
-Relations represented implicitly.
-Different kind of representation for each sense.
- **key idea: images can be scanned, in much the same way as physical percepts can be
- imaginal scanning is functionally equivalent to peceptual scanning
-Kosslyn's experiment: participants were shown a map of an imaginary island, participants studied until they can reproduce it accurately from memory
-instructed that on hearing name of an object on the island, they should picture the map, mentally scan directly to the mentioned object, and finally press a key as soon as they arrived at the location of the named object
• Results: almost perfect linear relationship between the distances separating successive pairs of objects in the mental map and the amount of time it took participants to press the button
• -in other words, participants seem to have encoded the map in the form of an image
5 True/False Questions
intramodal interference → -the structure of Images is like that of actual perceived objects, and can be re-organized & re-interpreted.
-Images are analogous to 2-1/2 D sketches.
--Images are assembled; assembly based on description (and interpretation) of component parts
--more complex images take longer to generate
serial processing → -The processing of several aspects of a problem simultaneously; the brain's natural mode of information processing for many functions, including vision. Contrasts with the step-by-step (serial) processing of most computers and of conscious problem solving. (Myers Psychology 8e p. 210)
conceptual-propositional theory → A. Theoretical Claims:
1. ALL information stored in Propositional codes
--sentence-like: CHASED (Dog, Cat)
--it is these propositional codes which do all the work when we answer visual-spatial questions?
2. All spatial information must be Explicitly represented, or able to be inferred from other explicitly-stated propositions:
BEHIND (Jim, Todd)
BEHIND (Annie, Jim)
3. All information stored is conceptually dependent.
-E.g., Piaget's children without knowledge of
Geocentric levels in tilted beaker experiment
4. Epiphenomenalism: though people may have a subjective experience of having generated an image, the image itself is non-causal to being able to answer an imagery-type question
structural equivalence → -Represents like pictures (not like sentences).
-Location, size, and distance are arranged in an image as they are in physical space.
--spatial relations among objects in an array are preserved
--1) Intramodal Interference
------Kosslyn: image & perception share a "visual buffer"
--------a. Brooks (1968)
----------Visual/Verbal Task x Visual/Verbal Response
image generation → (Kosslyn, Reiser, Farah, Fliegel, 1983)
-a. Takes longer to construct more detailed images, or those described as having more parts, e.g., "two overlapping rectangles" vs. "five squares in form of a cross"
-----Four columns of dots, 3 per column, vs. Three rows of dots, 4 per row
-b. The smaller the image size (or smaller the part/detail asked about), the longer the RT
--does a rabbit have ears, vs.does a rabbit have whiskers? (more obvious in our image generation that a rabbit has ears)
(also structural equivalence)