NAME: ________________________
5 Written Questions
5 Matching Questions
 Rules for Valid Syllogisms
 quantifier
 Directions for a Complete Analysis plus Evaluation
 standard form
 minor term
 a Step 1: Basic Analysis
Step 2: Argument » Fallacy
Step 3: If argument does not commit a fallacy » Diagram + verify that the diagram is consistent
Step 4: Kind of Argument
(deductive » truthfunctional/categorical)
(inductive » analogical, causal, inductive generalization)
Step 5: Evaluate
(If categorical » state syllogism in standard form + demonstrate valid/invalid using
1. Venn diagram or
2. rules for valid syllogisms)  b the form of presenting categorical claims following the formal rules of their expression
 c 1. The middle term must be distributed at least once
 d in a categorical syllogism, the subject term of the conclusion, which is also present in one of the premises
 e the term beginning a standard form categorical claimm, which indicates the quantity and quality of the claim
5 Multiple Choice Questions
 a common type of categorical argument, containing two premises and a conclusion
 in a standard form categorical claim, the second plural noun identifying a class, group, or set
 'only' term that refers to the subject term
 a diagram of overlapping circles used to represent the relationship between categorical claims
 in a categorical syllogism, the predicate term of the conclusion, which is also present in one of the premises
5 True/False Questions

Rules for Valid Syllogisms → a common type of categorical argument, containing two premises and a conclusion

middle term → in a categorical syllogism, the subject term of the conclusion, which is also present in one of the premises

only → 'only' term that refers to the predicate term

Rules for Valid Syllogisms → a common type of categorical argument, containing two premises and a conclusion

copula → 'only' term that refers to the predicate term