5 Written Questions
4 Matching Questions
 Venn diagram
 Rules for Valid Syllogisms
 copula
 minor term
 a in a categorical syllogism, the subject term of the conclusion, which is also present in one of the premises
 b in a categorical claim, the verb linking the subject and predicate terms
 c 4. A valid argument cannot have two negative premises
 d a diagram of overlapping circles used to represent the relationship between categorical claims
5 Multiple Choice Questions
 the term beginning a standard form categorical claimm, which indicates the quantity and quality of the claim
 in a standard form categorical claim, the second plural noun identifying a class, group, or set
 a deductive categorical argument in which a premise or conclusion is unstated
 in a categorical claim, a subject or predicate term that concerns every member of the group that the subject or predicate term represents
 in a categorical syllogism, the term that occurs in both premises but is absent from the conclusion
5 True/False Questions

Rules for Valid Syllogisms → a common type of categorical argument, containing two premises and a conclusion

Directions for a Complete Analysis plus Evaluation → Step 1: Basic Analysis
Step 2: Argument » Fallacy
Step 3: If argument does not commit a fallacy » Diagram + verify that the diagram is consistent
Step 4: Kind of Argument
(deductive » truthfunctional/categorical)
(inductive » analogical, causal, inductive generalization)
Step 5: Evaluate
(If categorical » state syllogism in standard form + demonstrate valid/invalid using
1. Venn diagram or
2. rules for valid syllogisms) 
standard form → in a categorical syllogism, the subject term of the conclusion, which is also present in one of the premises

only → 'only' term that refers to the subject term

categorical syllogism → 3. If a premise is negative, the conclusion must be negative, and vice versa