Print test
5 Written questions
5 Matching questions
 Directions for a Complete Analysis plus Evaluation
 major term
 copula
 the only
 middle term
 a Step 1: Basic Analysis
Step 2: Argument » Fallacy
Step 3: If argument does not commit a fallacy » Diagram + verify that the diagram is consistent
Step 4: Kind of Argument
(deductive » truthfunctional/categorical)
(inductive » analogical, causal, inductive generalization)
Step 5: Evaluate
(If categorical » state syllogism in standard form + demonstrate valid/invalid using
1. Venn diagram or
2. rules for valid syllogisms)  b in a categorical syllogism, the term that occurs in both premises but is absent from the conclusion
 c in a categorical syllogism, the predicate term of the conclusion, which is also present in one of the premises
 d 'only' term that refers to the subject term
 e in a categorical claim, the verb linking the subject and predicate terms
5 Multiple choice questions
 a diagram of overlapping circles used to represent the relationship between categorical claims
 in a standard form categorical claim, the second plural noun identifying a class, group, or set
 in a categorical claim, a subject or predicate term that concerns every member of the group that the subject or predicate term represents
 the form of presenting categorical claims following the formal rules of their expression
 in a categorical syllogism, the subject term of the conclusion, which is also present in one of the premises
5 True/False questions

Rules for Valid Syllogisms → 5. A valid argument cannot have two universal premises when the conclusion is particular

Rules for Valid Syllogisms → a common type of categorical argument, containing two premises and a conclusion

only → 'only' term that refers to the subject term

Rules for Valid Syllogisms → a common type of categorical argument, containing two premises and a conclusion

enthymeme → a deductive categorical argument in which a premise or conclusion is unstated