Directors' Duty of Loyalty

About this set

Created by:

CougarAbogado  on December 15, 2010

Subjects:

corporations 1

Log in to favorite or report as inappropriate.
Pop out
No Messages

You must log in to discuss this set.

Directors' Duty of Loyalty

Internal Controls
*Directors must ensure there are adequate internal controls to educate on the law and deter wrong doing
*Board decides whether controls are adequate, under BJR
*Ct. will get involved only when there's a sustained/systematic failure of board to exercise oversight
*If board simply ignores system, that could be grounds for loyalty claims
*Compliance systems help a lot in federal sentencing guidelines (mitigating factor)
1/12

Study:

Cards (new!)

Learn

Test

Speller

Scatter

Games:

Scatter

Space Race

Tools:

Export

Copy

Combine

Embed

Order by

Terms

Definitions

Internal Controls*Directors must ensure there are adequate internal controls to educate on the law and deter wrong doing
*Board decides whether controls are adequate, under BJR
*Ct. will get involved only when there's a sustained/systematic failure of board to exercise oversight
*If board simply ignores system, that could be grounds for loyalty claims
*Compliance systems help a lot in federal sentencing guidelines (mitigating factor)
Good Faith Breaches *Intentionally acting against corp.'s best interests
*Intentionally acting to violate law
*Conscious disregard of duty
*Much worse than gross negligence: I intend harm or intentionally disregard duty
*Therefore, Ps must show sustained/systematic failure (= intent)
Good Faith/Duty of Loyalty *Good faith falls under duty of loyalty
Risk Management Claim Cases *Vast majority tossed b/c they're simply post-hoc judgments
*Bad outcome ~= bad faith
*Cts. very reluctant to second guess internal controls, even more so w/risk management
Self-interested Transactions *Ct. will review and set aside if unfair (used to be automatically void)
Interested v. Independent *Different
*Interested = personal interest in transaction separate from SHs
*Dependent = tied to person or corp.
*Cts. give directors presumption that they're acting in corp.'s best interest
Setting aside BJR *If BJR's overcome, case goes forward on the merits (far from over and done)
*If self-interested, directors have the burden to show transaction fair/intrinsically fair
*Directors had better show a semblance of arm's length transaction - get a better/multiple valuation/fairness opinion
Showing Fairness *Procedure, paperwork, fairness opinion, indep. disinterested directors, minutes set out the reasons why K is in best interests of corp., etc.
Overcoming Self-Dealing in OH*SD ~voidable if:
a) Disclosure to the board who, in GF reason. justified by facts, can approve if a majority of disint. directors approve trans., even if disint. directors<quorum OR
b) Disint. SHs give specific approval at meeting held for that purpose, w/relevant info, given advance notice; OR
c) K fair when entered into
Overcoming Self-Dealing in DEL. *Once D shows all sanitizing procedure of disclosure, etc., the burden shifts to P to show unfair transaction
Corp. Opportunity Doctrine *There is opportunity that could benefit corp. and D takes it
*D AT LEAST must disclose
*Once disclosure, we want to see other directors use info to make informed decision, as well as disinterested/independent
*Using corp. resources to discover/sift out opportunity definitely implicates the doctrine
Line of Business Test *Was the opportunity D took in corp.'s line of business?
*Highly factual
*Candy store/Pepsi stock case

First Time Here?

Welcome to Quizlet, a fun, free place to study. Try these flashcards, find others to study, or make your own.

Set Champions

There are no high scores or champions for this set yet. You can sign up or log in to be the first!