US Supreme Court Cases (landmark)

About this set

Created by:

sounasian  on March 21, 2011

Subjects:

ap government, apnsl

Description:

all landmark Supreme Court cases

Log in to favorite or report as inappropriate.
Pop out
No Messages

You must log in to discuss this set.

US Supreme Court Cases (landmark)

Marbury v Madison
Judicial Review
1/63

Study:

Cards (new!)

Learn

Test

Speller

Scatter

Games:

Scatter

Space Race

Tools:

Export

Copy

Combine

Embed

Order by

Terms

Definitions

Marbury v Madison Judicial Review
McCulloch v Maryland Supremacy Clause
Gibbons v Ogden Congress can regulate interstate commerce
Dred Scott v Sanford African Americans could nto bring cases to court because they were property
Reynolds v US You can't use Religion to escape from laws that apply to everyone; Constitution protects Religions, not their practices
Plessy v Ferguson Seperate but equal
Schenk v US Government can prosecute people who through expressive or symbolic speech present a "clear and present danger"
Gitlow v New York First Ammendment applied to the states (selective incorporation)
Powell v Alabama The defendant must be given legal counsel if requested as part of Due Process
Korematsu v US Legal to intern Japanese Americans due to possible espionage
West Virginia v Barnett Not required to say the Pledge of Allegiance
Everson v Board of Education Transportation is secular
Brown v Board of Education Seperate is unequal in schools (desegregates schools)
Mapp v Ohio Exclusionary Rule
Engel v Vitale Unconstitutional to have a mandated school prayer
Baker v Carr One man one vote
Gideon v Wainwright every person is gauranteed a lawyer; informa pauperis
New York Times v Sullivan Established bounds of Freedom of Speech; No libel; Public figures must prove malice
Escobedo v Illinois You have the right to a lawyer; created an extension of the sixth amendment
Griswold v Connecticut Privacy
In re Gault Due Process extends to Juveniles
Miranda v Arizona As you're arrested, your "Miranda" rights must be read to you
Loving v Virginia Interracial Marriage is allowed
Epperson v Arkansas You are allowed to teach evolution (violates free speech)
Brandenburg v Ohio "imminent lawless action" is a standard, one must be "likely to produce such action"
Tinker v Des Moines If student speech does not cause a substantial disruption to a learning environment, it is protected speech
New York Times v US Pentagon Papers; there is no prior restraint
Lemon v Kurtzman Lemon Test; 1, Secular purpose 2, neither advancement nor inhibition of Religion 3, no excessive government entanglement
Wisconsin v Yoder Amish children can't be forced to go to school past eigth grade as it violates their Religous freedom
Miller v California Defines Obscenity; Establishes Slaps test
Roe v Wade Right to abortion
US v Nixon The Presidents executive privelige is not complete
Goss v Lopez Kids can't be suspended without Due Process
Buckley v Valeo Campaign Funding is a form of protected speech; there is still a limit on campaign money
Bakke v University of California Quotas are illegal
Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier Schools can censor speech if not in accordance with the school's beliefs/ education goals
Wallace v Jaffree Intended Religous activity in schools is UnConstitutional
New Jersey v TLO Can conduct school searches of students if there is reasonable suspicion
Allegheny County v Greater Pittsburgh ACLU Placing a cresse inside a public building violates the Establishment Clause; how religous is the symbol, where is it placed
Texas v Johnson Flag burning is protected; draft card burning is not protected
Oregon v Smith / Employment Division v Smith Everybody is held to the same drug restriction standard
Westside Community Schools v Mergens Students can organize religous clubs as long school administration takes no part in it
Casey v Planned Parenthood A wife does not need a husbands consent to get a abortion, minors however need parent consent
Lee v Weisman Inviting Religous officials to make speeches (eg. graduation) is UnConstitutional
Shaw v Reno Gerrymandering can't be based on race
Vernonia School District v Acton Random drug testing of athletes by a school is protected
US v Virginia No gender based discrimination during the admissions process at the VMI
Reno v ACLU Established communications decency act (banned later)
Bush v Gore Florida recount after Presidential election
Boy Scout of America v Dale Freedom of Association
US v Morrison Can't sue for sexual assault in a Federal Court
Kyllo v US Searching for something from the outside of someones house in order to gain evidence to obtain a warrat is UnConstitutional
Board of Education v Earls Schools have a right to drug test their students
Lawrence v Texas Consenting adults have a right to sexual behaviour in their home
Grutter v Bollinger Affirmative action is still needed today
Gratz v Bollinger Affirmative action is still needed today
Van Order v Perry A display of the Ten Commandments outside of a Texas Court house is legal
Gonzalez v Raich Home-grown drugs can be banned under the commerce clause
Kelo v City of New London The government can take private property and give it to developers
Roper v Simmons Minors can't be executed
Hamdan v Rumsfeld Prisoners at Guantanamo Bay have rights
DC v Heller you can own a gun in DC
Citizens United v FEC The corporate funding of independent public broadcasts cannot be limited (under the First Amendment)

First Time Here?

Welcome to Quizlet, a fun, free place to study. Try these flashcards, find others to study, or make your own.

Set Champions

Scatter Champion

57.1 secs by sounasian 

Completed “Learn” mode

sounasian