5 Written questions
5 Matching questions
- Various types of plagiarism
- How do audiences engage in a mental dialogue with the speaker as they listen to a persuasive speech?
- Importance of cultural diversity
- Lucas' methods of dealing with nervousness
- a -Acquire speaking experience.
-Prepare, prepare, prepare.
-Use the power of visualization.
-Know that most nervousness is not visible.
-Don't expect perfection.
- b -Global plagiarism
-Plagiarism and the internet
- c The speaker needs to take into account that the meanings attached to gestures, facial expressions, and other nonverbal signals vary from culture to culture.
- d An explicit comparison, introduced with the word "like" or "as," between things that are essentially different yet have something in common.
- e While listening, they assess the speaker's credibility, delivery, supporting materials, language, reasoning, and emotional appeals.
5 Multiple choice questions
- Presenting another person's language or ideas as one's own
- Reiteration of the same word or set of words at the beginning or end of successive clauses or sentences.
- A speech that pays tribute to a person, a group of people, an institution, or an idea.
- -Problem-solution order
-Comparative advantages order
-Monroe's motivated sequence
- Reasoning that moves from a general principle to a specific conclusion.
5 True/False questions
Parallelism → The similar arrangement of a pair or series of related words, phrases, or sentences.
Similarities Between Public Speaking and Conversation → -Public speaking is more highly structured
-Public speaking requires more formal language
-Public speaking requires a different method of delivery
Rhythm → The second basic issue in analyzing a question of policy: If there is a problem with current policy, does the speaker have a plan to solve the problem?
Need → The first basic issue in analyzing a question of policy: Is there a serious problem or need that requires a change from current policy?
Casual reasoning → Reasoning in which a speaker compares two similar cases and infers that what is true for the first case is also true for the second.