AP GOPO Court Case Bonanza
About this set
Created by:
fleigsha8017 on April 12, 2011
Description:
Mead High School AP GOPO Court Case Bonanza 2011
Log in to favorite or report as inappropriate.
Order by
45 terms
Terms | Definitions |
|---|---|
 Barron v. Baltimore, 1833 | Claims that the Bill of Rights protections DO NOT apply to intrusions by state governments. |
| Gitlow v. New York, 1925 | By incorporating the Bill of Rights into the 14th Amendment, it overturns precedent in claiming the Bill of Rights DOES apply to state governments. |
| School Dist. Of Abington v. Schempp, 1963 | Strikes down practice of school-sponsored Bible reading as a violation of the establishment clause. |
| Engle v. Vitale, 1962 | Strikes down an involuntary, non-denominational prayer at the beginning of the school day as a violation of the establishment clause. |
| Lemon v. Kurtzman, 1971 | Establishes a test to determine whether federal funding to parochial schools violates the establishment clause. |
| Wallace v. Jaffree, 1985 | Strikes down an Alabama law that allowed teachers to conduct religious prayer services and activities during the school day. |
| Elk Grove School Dist v. Newdow, 2003 | Dismisses a case challenging the constitutionality of the phrase "One Nation Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance. |
| Reynolds v. U.S., 1878 | Rules that religious duty is not sufficient defense against criminal charges of polygamy (First Amendment does not protect polygamy as a religious practice). |
| Wisconsin v. Yoder, 1972 | The Court ruled that Amish adolescents could be exempt from a state law compelling school attendance |
| Church of the Lukumi Babalu v. Hialeah, 1993 | The Court found laws passed by four Florida cities banning animal sacrifice were targeted at the Santeria religion, which employs animal sacrifice in prayer, and as such the laws were unconstitutional. |
| Van Orden v. Perry, 2005 | A Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of a state capitol building does not violate the First Amendment's establishment clause because "simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with a religious doctrine does not run afoul of the establishment clause." |
| Miller v. California, 1973 | Establishes a test for local authorities to define the nature of "obscenity." |
| Virginia v. Black, 2003 | Declares cross burning is protected by the First Amendment as long as the act does not have the intent to intimidate. |
| Schenk v. US, 1919 | Declares speech will NOT be protected if it creates a "clear and present danger." |
| Bethel v. Fraser, 1988 | Declares student speech is NOT protected by the First Amendment if it lacks value and is "disruptive of learning." |
| Tinker v. Des Moines, 1968 | Protects "symbolic speech" of students protesting with armbands. |
| Texas v. Johnson, 1989 | Protects flag burning as "symbolic speech" |
| Near v. Minnesota, 1931 | Declares "prior restraint" unconstitutional; that is, governments cannot suppress or regulate speech before it is given. |
| Morse v. Frederick, 2007 | Upholds the authority of public school administrators to suspend students for promoting illegal drugs at a school event ("Bong Hits for Jesus"). |
| NY Times v. Sullivan, 1964 | Requires proof of "malicious intent to harm" in order to prove libel against news organizations. |
| Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, 1987 | Upholds the authority of public school administrators to censor student newspapers since they are tools for learning - not forums of free expression. |
| Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, 2000 | Upholds the Boy Scouts authority as a private institution to exclude Dale on the basis of his homosexuality (ignoring New Jersey public accommodation law). |
| Village of Skokie v. National Socialist Party, 1978 or (Wikipedia) | The Supreme Court ruled that the National Socialist (Nazi) Party could not be prohibited from marching peacefully, simply because of the content of their message. |
| New Jersey v. TLO, 1984 | Permits school officials to search student property with standard of "reasonable suspicion." |
| Griswold v. Connecticut, 1965 | "Though the Constitution does not explicitly protect a general right to privacy...together, the First, Third, Fourth, and Ninth Amendments, create a new constitutional right, the right to privacy in marital relations." |
| Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 1992 | Upholds mandatory waiting period and parental consent for abortion, but strikes down spousal notification. |
| Roe v. Wade, 1973 | Establishes a woman's right to choose an abortion and creates guidelines for the states according to trimesters. |
| Mapp v. Ohio, 1961 | Establishes the "exclusionary rule," stating that illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible in court. |
| Veronia School Dist. V. Acton, 1995 | Upholds right of public school administrators to conduct random drug tests (urinalysis) to student athletes. |
| Gregg v. Georgia, 1976 | Upholds the constitutionality of capital punishment. |
| Stanford v. Kentucky, 1989 | Upholds the constitutionality of capital punishment for minors. |
| Ropers v. Simmons, 2005 | The Courts determined the execution of a minor violates the "cruel and unusual punishment" provision of the 8th Amendment. Overturns Stanford v. Kentucky, 1989. |
| Gideon v. Wainwright, 1963 | Protects the right of the accused person to have an attorney provided free of charge. |
| Miranda v. Arizona, 1966 | Requires authorities to notify people of their rights to silence and counsel upon arrest. |
| Rasul v. Bush, 2002 | Declares U.S. court system has jurisdiction to consider legal appeals by foreign nationals (non-citizens) imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base. |
| Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 2006 | Declares that enemy combatants have habeas corpus rights, and international rules of war (Geneva Convention) may be enforced in U.S. federal court |
| Kelo v. City of New London, 2005 | Based on a broader interpretation of "public use" this case upholds the power of city governments to take private property for the purpose of selling it off to private developers. |
| Plessy v. Ferguson, 1896 | Upholds the doctrine of "separate but equal" in public facilities. |
| Brown v. Board of Education, 1954 | Strikes down the doctrine of "separate but equal" in public schools, claiming that separate is inherently unequal. |
| University of Cal. Regents v. Bakke, 1978 | Upholds the use of race as a determining factor in graduate school admissions, but strikes down the notion of minimum racial "quotas." |
| Gratz v. Bollinger, 2003 | Struck down the University of Michigan's heavy use of racial preferences in undergraduate admissions. |
| United States v. Virginia, 1996 | Under the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause the Court held that Virginia Military Institute's male-only admissions policy was unconstitutional. |
| Baker v. Carr, 1962 | Establishes the principle of "one man, one vote," by declaring that legislative districts must be as near as possible in population (protects against aggressive gerrymandering). |
| Lawrence v. Texas | Strikes down state laws banning homosexual activity as unconstitutional violations of the right to privacy. Overturns Bowers v. Hardwick, 1986. |
| Escobedo v. Illinois, 1964 | Establishes for the first time the absolute right to remain silent and have counsel present during questioning (based on 6th Amendment) |
First Time Here?
Welcome to Quizlet, a fun, free place to study. Try these flashcards, find others to study, or make your own.