Sprange v Bernard
Where the whole thing is put on trust with the "remaining part he doesn't want" to go to somebody else, then that bit's ignored for want of certainty and the whole thing goes on trust
Palmer v Simmonds
The "bulk" of my residuary estate is void for want of certainty
Anthony v Donges
"Minimal part" is void for certainty
Despite uncertainty issue, courts will happily define what is a "reasonable income"
Re Goldcorp Exchange
Follows Re London Wine (shippers) in of certainty of chattels - must be identifiable.
Huner v Moss
The problematic UK case for shares - Dillon LJ says this reasoning should only apply to chattels
White v Shortall
The alternative Australian analysis for Hunter v Moss