NAME: ________________________

Informal Falacies Test

Question Types


Prompt With


Question Limit

of 25 available terms

5 Written Questions

5 Matching Questions

  1. appeal to ignorance
  2. bifurcation
  3. argumentative essay
  4. circular argument
  5. conclusion indicators
  1. a the fallacy that occurs when the lack of evidence against thesis is emphasized rather than the evidence for the thesis
  2. b an essay that takes a widely held conclusion particular to a subject, or conclusion particular to another writer or thinker, and agreed with, disagrees with, or somehow modifies the conclusion
  3. c an argument in which the conclusion is ultimately justified with itself
  4. d a word or phrase that often accompanies a conclusion. Examples include "therefore"; "thus"; "hence"; "it follows that"; 'we may infer that"; "so"; and "we may conclude that"
  5. e the fallacy that is committed by assuming that a distinction is exclusive, when other alternatives exist. Also known as the "either/or fallacy," "black-and-white fallacy" and "false dilemma"

5 Multiple Choice Questions

  1. the state of having more than one correct meaning
  2. the fallacy that occurs when a statement is ambiguous because (1) the intended tone of voice is uncertain (2) its stress is unclear (3) it is quoted out of context
  3. the fallacy committed by assuming that what is true of parts (or members) is true of the whole (or group)
  4. a two-premises deductive argument containing three terms (the major, the minor, and the middle terms), each term occurring two times in the argument
  5. an expression that is so overused that is has become practically meaningless

5 True/False Questions

  1. argumentthe fallacy that occurs when a statement is ambiguous because (1) the intended tone of voice is uncertain (2) its stress is unclear (3) it is quoted out of context

          

  2. appeal to pitythe fallacy committed by seeking to persuade by arousing pity.

          

  3. aphorisman adage; a short formulation of a truth or sentiment

          

  4. Abusive ad hominema type of personal-attack fallacy in which the opposing speaker is accused of having vested interests

          

  5. complex question(1) the statement in an argument that is supported by the premises; (2) the statement that the arguer attempts to prove.