Language Arts Rhetoric

About this set

Created by:

ChloeYoutsey  on October 10, 2011

Subjects:

ap english

Description:

NONSENSE

Log in to favorite or report as inappropriate.
Pop out
Last Message: 19 months ago
talkin2thepilow : Way to share these with everyone else! You're so kind!

You must log in to discuss this set.

Language Arts Rhetoric

argument ad hominem
in latin means "against the man"
in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the person presenting the claim
1/35
Preview our new flashcards mode!

Study:

Cards

Speller

Learn

Test

Scatter

Games:

Scatter

Space Race

Tools:

Export

Copy

Combine

Embed

Order by

Terms

Definitions

argument ad hominem in latin means "against the man"
in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the person presenting the claim
argument ad populum latin: "to the people"
an appeal to numbers; to our desire to fit in with the majority
appeal to authority argues a claim is true because a person judged to be an authority affirms the claim
appeal to ignorance the arguer tries to use the lack of evidence as support for a positive claim about the truth of a conclusion
appeal to pity an arguer tries to get people to accept a conclusion by making them feel sorry for someone
appeal to tradition something is better or correct simply because it is older, traditional, or "always has been done"
"if it isn't broken don't fix it"
bandwagon fallacy argument that appeals to the growing popularity of an idea as a reason for accepting it as true
begging the question in which the premise includes the claim that the conclusion is true or (directly or indirectly) assumes that the conclusion is true
false dilemma/either/or fallacy arguer sets up the situation so it looks like there are only two choices: are left with only one option
guilt by association in which a person rejects a claim simply because people he/she dislikes accept it
hasty generalization making assumptions about a whole group on a sample that is inadequate; stereotyping
non sequitur "it does not follow"
stating, as a conclusion, something that does not strictly follow from the premise
poisoning the well trying to discredit what a person might later claim by presenting unfavorable information (be it true or untrue) about the person
attack is made prior to the person even making the claim or claims
post hoc "this word, ergo propter hoc"; translates as "after this, therefore because of this"
correlation wrongly being linked to causation
red herring going off on a tangent, raising a side issue that distracts the audience from what's really at stake
slippery slope claiming that a chain reaction will inevitably take place, in reality there is not enough evidence for that assumption
straw man to anticipate and respond in advance to the arguments that an opponent might make; sets up a weak version of the opposition's stance and defeats it, but it's not all that impressive to knock down something that isn't very stable
exordium introduction
establishes ethos
includes "hook and lead"
narratio narration
appeals to logos
why we should care
partitio partition
plan of development
confirmatio confirmation
body paragraphs
supports claim
refutatio refutation
addresses the counter argument as to support claim and shoot down any opposition
concede agree there's a point
refute deny validity
peroratio conclusion
appeal to pathos and reminds the reader of the ethos established earlier
answers the question, "so what?"
claim assertion or conclusion which must be proven or supported
debatable point
data the evidence supporting the claim
warrant basic principle or assumption that connects the claim and the data in an argument and reveals the arguer's own beliefs or values
qualifier a statement about how strong the claim is
rebuttal/reservation an exception to your claim
backing defending the warrant with reasons
Rogerian argument arguing to negotiate differences
done partially by restating opposing position fairly and accurately, without either praise or blame, as to be capable of expressing alternative views in full understanding
summary of opposing views accurately and neutrally as possible, states the views of people with whom you disagree
statement of understanding throwing the other guy a bone
recognizing legitimacy of claim
statement of contexts describes situations in which you hope your views would be honored

First Time Here?

Welcome to Quizlet, a fun, free place to study. Try these flashcards, find others to study, or make your own.

Set Champions

Speller Champion

83.9% correct by ChloeYoutsey 

Completed “Learn” mode

ChloeYoutsey