5 Written Questions

1. -Girl kidnapped for fraternity hazing; head gets cracked on pavement
   -drinking off campus; incident on campus
   -bystander era
   -no duty
2. -Court refused to impose liability on a college for injuries suffered by a student
   -off campus event; faculty member signed off for the alcohol
   -students left (drunk) and hit a pot hole and tried to sue the city
   -Bradshaw was paralyzed in passenger seat
   -Bystander Era
3. -student lived on campus and was sexually assaulted and raped
   -door had a lock broken and had not been fixed
   -established ordinary duty between university and student
   -Duty Era
4. -Killed in loco parentis
   -In loco parentis era
   -Due Process
   -5th circuit
5. -Enforced in loco parentis
   -student joined secret society at university
   -since he matriculated through the university, wasn't allowed to do so
   -In loco parentis

5 Multiple Choice Questions

1. -Due process rights for students
   -Vagueness of student code of conduct
   -Civil Rights Era
   -Established a checklist for due process
   1. Esteban v. Central Missouri State College 1969
   2. Petri v. Louisiana Tech 1996
   3. Pratt v. Wheaton College 1860
   4. Mullins v. Pine Manor College 1983
2. -sledding case; students were warned of dangers of sledding, student still did it
   -duty era
   -crosscurrent to duty era
   -university had no duty
   1. Dixon v. Alabama 1961
   2. Beach v. Univ. of Utah 1986
   3. Regina v. Hopely 1860
   4. Petri v. Louisiana Tech 1996
3. -field trip where student gets drunk and falls in ravine and injures themselves
   -bystander era
   -university had no duty to protect student
   -student is viewed as constitutional adult
   1. Delaney v. University of Houston 1990
   2. Baldwin v. Zoradi 1981
   3. Petri v. Louisiana Tech 1996
   4. Beach v. Univ. of Utah 1986
4. -Student is robbed and sexually assaulted at internship location offered by school
   -special relationship existed between university and plaintiff which created duty
   -Extended legal liability to protect students off campus
   -duty era casee
   1. Bradshaw v. Rawlings 1979
   2. Baldwin v. Zoradi 1981
   3. Nova Southeastern v. Gross 2000
   4. Pratt v. Wheaton College 1860
5. -**** beaten out of a kid by tutor
   -wasn't protected by in loco parentis
   -found guilty
   -crosscurrent case to in loco parentis
   1. Baldwin v. Zoradi 1981
   2. Bradshaw v. Rawlings 1979
   3. Dixon v. Alabama 1961
   4. Regina v. Hopely 1860

5 True/False Questions

1. Furek v. University of Delaware 1991 → -University owed a duty to protect students from injuries suffered from a hazing incidient
   -University was held liable to some extent due to the issue of owning the land in which fraternity was located
   -Duty Era
   -crosscurrent to bystander era

   True        False

2. Baldwin v. Zoradi 1981 → -Killed in loco parentis
   -In loco parentis era
   -Due Process
   -5th circuit

   True        False

3. Terasoff v. Board of Regents 1976 → -told psychologist he was going to kill student
   -forseeability of harm
   -duty to warn the student
   -therapist was found liable
   -crosscurrent to bystander era

   True        False

4. Mullins v. Pine Manor College 1983 → -student was raped on campus
   -crosscurrent to bystander era
   -university was liable
   -had duty

   True        False

5. Mintz v. State of New York (1968) → -field trip where student gets drunk and falls in ravine and injures themselves
   -bystander era
   -university had no duty to protect student
   -student is viewed as constitutional adult

   True        False