← Abnormal Child Psych 2c Test
5 Written Questions
5 Matching Questions
- psychosocial influences as etiology
- learning disorder and behavior
- Individuals with disabilities act (IDEA)
- metacognition
- automatization
- a higher risk for behav prob; may occur preschool through early childhood; externalizing behav more common in young/ internalizing more common in older kids (stevenson); able to confirm clear dev transition that children engage in externalizing/late childhood is internal; keep watch on children (beitchman)
- b engaging in reading with as few cognitive resources as possible
- c comprehension monitoring; making sure you know what you just read
- d includes condition such as perceptual handicaps, brain injuries, minimal brain dysfunction, dyslexia, developmental aphasia -- doesn't include visual, motor, or hearing handicaps, MR, or environmental/cultural disturbance
- e larger family size, mother-infant interaction; lowered teacher expectations (learned helplessness model)- kids expected to do poorly will; class size
5 Multiple Choice Questions
- cerebellum, auditory pathways (temporal lobe), visual pathway (parietal lobe)
- inc risk for social prob 25-60%; rated by peers as unpopular, more rejected, more neglected (rejects/neglects are most at risk); why: related to behav prob, low social competence, trouble with: emo rec/guessing how others feel/true nature of a social prob
- understanding what you're reading
- development characterized by inc speed and dec effort
- mr, lang/comm dis, vision/hearing loss, PDD, environment deprivation
5 True/False Questions
-
asymmtery in brain → etiology; people with a larger left side/left asym. do not have reading disorders and show greater left activation; if equal or right asym. there are problems and show greater right activation
-
diagnostic criteria: reading disorder → 10-15%
-
gender differences of reading disorders → due to diagnostic differences across countries - differences in phonemic structure of different languages
-
developmental course of reading disorders → inc IQ + inc mom's reading ability + dec initial severity = better outcome
-
prevalence of reading disorders → 3:1 (male:female) clinically
1.5: 1 (male:female) in general population
boys are more likely to be disruptive and thus their disorder called to attention
Regenerate Test