CJS101 Chapter 8
About this set
Created by:
Beckirobertsx on November 18, 2011
Subjects:
Log in to favorite or report as inappropriate.
Order by
35 terms
Terms | Definitions |
|---|---|
The arrest powers of police include | the power to search |
The investigative powers of police include | the power to detain |
the 4th ammendment protects citizens from | unreasonable search and seizure |
unreasonable searches and seizures in constitutional terms are those | that are not justified by the apparent facts |
probable cause refers to | facts or apparent facts that are reliable and generate a a responsible belief has been commited |
if a citizen suffers an unlawful arrest the citizen | can institute a civil suit against the arresting officer |
the final decision in terry v. ohio held that | when a police officer observes unusual conductand suspects a crime has been commited he or she may frisk a suspects outer clothing for dangerous weapons |
random spot checking of automobiles is offically | used by police officers as a form of proactive control |
although warentless search of a premiss is limited | by 4th ammendment interpretations, it is premitted under certain condtitions when the person controlling the area in question gives consent to search |
the 4th ammendment does not protect chromosomes against searches and seizures by | private nongovernment individuals |
according to the plain view doctrine | whatever a police officer sees in plain view when the officer has a right to be where she is is not the subject of a search and is therefore admissible as evidence |
the plain view doctrine has been materially broadened by the | protective sweep doctrine |
involuntary confessions are prohibited by the | 5th ammendment |
the assitance of counsel is guarenteed by the | 6th ammendment |
the intent of the prompt arraignment rule in both sanctuary law and supreme court decisions is to | place a check against police 3rd dgree practices during interrogation |
the decision in Escobedo V. Illinois held that | when an investigation becomes acusatory and its purpose is to elicit a confession, the acused must be premitted to consult with an attorney |
the escobedo decision required that the acused be permitted to have an attorney present at | interogation |
the right to remain silent is part of | miranda warning rules |
the miranda warnings must be recited to a subject | prior to custodial interogation |
in a police show up | the victim or witness assits the police artist in reconstructing a likeness of the subject |
the search warrant is issued by the | magistrate |
police powers are generally divided into two categories | investigative and arrest powers |
the supreme court has held that motorists may be stopped with probable cause | or as part of a spot checkin which all motorists are being stopped |
when persons give consent to be searched the waive right to | protection from unreasonable search and seziure |
the obnibus crime control and safe streets act of 1968 included a provision reguarding electronic easedropping that authorized | federalwiretaps and other easedropping devices only though warrants approved by the attorney general and his assitant |
protection against illegal search and seizure is guarenteed by the | 4th ammendment |
under the protective sweep doctrine | when an arrest is executed law enforcement officers may conduct a search for others who may threaten the officers saftey and destroy evidence |
the eclusionary rule is a general doctrine that prohibnits the use of evidence obtained in searches that violate the | 4th ammendment protecction against illegal search and seizure |
in the us V. Ross, decided in 1982 the high court held that where police have probable cause to search a motor vehicle,the may do so | provvided the search is limited to the passanger compartment of the vehicle |
in Illinois V. Lafayette the supreme court ruled that invetory searches | are a violation of the 4th ammendment |
the fruit of a poisonus tree deals specifically with | tainted evidence |
Minesota V. Dickerson established the plain feel doctrine. Which is? | an object a police officer dectects on a suspectts person during the course of a valid protective frisk under terry v. ohio may be sseized without a warrant |
in 1976, the supreme court held that when police have custody of a lawfully impounded automobile, they do not need a warrant or the owners consent before routinley inventoring items left in plain view in the glove compartment. What is this called | this is called inventory exception |
the protective sweep doctrine | has expanded the plain view doctrine considerably |
dna testing has been especially useful in | rape cases |
First Time Here?
Welcome to Quizlet, a fun, free place to study. Try these flashcards, find others to study, or make your own.