ex.4 pt.5

About this set

Created by:

lcdavis  on December 5, 2011

Subjects:

bnad302

Log in to favorite or report as inappropriate.
Pop out
No Messages

You must log in to discuss this set.

ex.4 pt.5

social loafing
tendency for people to exert less effort when working in group than when working alone
1/26
Preview our new flashcards mode!

Study:

Cards

Speller

Learn

Test

Scatter

Games:

Scatter

Space Race

Tools:

Export

Copy

Combine

Embed

Order by

Terms

Definitions

social loafing tendency for people to exert less effort when working in group than when working alone
norming conflicts are resolved, close relationships develop, and unity and harmony emerge; feelings of group cohesiveness
devils advocate role-playing criticism to test whether a proposal is workable; process of assigning someone to play the role of critic
groupthink cohesive group's blind unwillingness to consider alternatives
2 behavioral leadership styles job-centered, and employee centered
job-centered o managers pay more attention to job and work procedures
employee-centered o managers pay more attention to employee satisfaction and making work groups cohesive
3 dimensions of situational control leader-member relations, task structure, position power
How does performance and conflict relate to each other • an inverted u-shape
• too little conflict= laziness
• too much conflict= warfare
• personality conflicts o interpersonal opposition based on personal dislike, disagreement, or differing styles
-personality clashes, competition for scare resources, time pressure, communication failures
personality clashes when individual differences can't be resolved
competition for scarce resources when two parties need the same things
time pressure when people believe there aren't enough hours to do the work
communication failures when people misperceive and misunderstand
intergroup conflicts o clashes between work groups, teams, and departments,
-inconsistent goals/reward system, ambiguous jurisdictions, status differences
inconsistent goals when people pursuer different objectives
ambiguous jurisdictions when job boundaries are unclear
status differences when there are inconsistencies in power and influence
various conflict handling approaches avoiding, accomodating, forcing, compromising, collaborating
avoiding "maybe the problem will disappear"
o ignoring or suppressing a conflict
o good for trivial issues
accommodating "let's do it your way"
o encourages cooperation, but it's only a temporary fix
o doesn't confront underlying problems
forcing "you have to do it my way"
o ordering an outcome
o implementing an unpopular solution
o fast- quick results
o doesn't resolves personal conflict
compromising "let's split the difference"
o both give up something to gain something
o democratic process, no real losers
collaborating "let's cooperate to reach a win-win solution that benefits both of us
o good for complex issues
o not good for solving conflict rooted in opposing value systems
o longer-lasting impact
o time-consuming
o best approach
appropriate methods to end a speech • lets review
• in conclusion
• I want to leave you with one last though
• Finally, let me close
• As Albert Einstein said..
• End with "Thank you"
-What theories are inherent to the Contingency Approach to leadership • contingency-leadership model
• path-goal leadership model
• situational leadership theory

First Time Here?

Welcome to Quizlet, a fun, free place to study. Try these flashcards, find others to study, or make your own.

Set Champions

There are no high scores or champions for this set yet. You can sign up or log in to be the first!