| Term | Definition |
|---|
| Mccauley v R) | implied repeal can apply to normal and constitutional statutes |
| Thoburn | says you cant impliedly repeal constitutional statutes |
| R v Pora | if parliament acts to take away fundy rights it must speak clearly, general and ambiguous words wont be enough to impliedly repeal cosntituional statues (boom no implied repeal) |
| Taylor v NZ Poultry Board | "some common law rights lie so deep that even parliament could not override them" |
| Cooper v AG | fishing quota removed . Judge was happy not to deal with the issue of fundamental rights |
| Shaw v IRD | shaw complained of a breach of the magna carter, taxation. "a taxpayers grievance is not fundamental" |
| Jackson v AG | if parliament removes right to check executive or the courts, then constitutional framework may need to be revisited. |
| Tre Thowan | if you want to abolish referendum you need a referendum. NSW tried to abolish house, Pc said no as didn't subscribe with manner and form |
| Factortaine | EU law trumps british domestic law, fishing quota, HOL held british act to be invaid as inconsistent with international law |
| Collaberative Enterprise | "we are only halfway on a constitutional journey" "in the fullness of time we will leave parliamentary sovereignty behind altogether" |
Combine with other sets
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace
!