| Term | Definition |
|
affirmative and negative |
two sides to a debate |
|
affirmative |
speaks first and last in every argument |
|
prep time |
is 8 mins long, given to a team during a debate, and can only be used before one of your own speeches |
|
constructive speech |
new arguments are presented in this type of speech |
|
rebuttal speech |
arguments may only be extended upon or added to in this type of speech |
|
cross examine |
to question another individual, has three main purposes |
|
policy |
the plan that the affirmative side presents during a case. |
|
fiat |
the power given to the affirmative team that for the purpose of the debate round, it is assumed by both teams that the aff's plan will be enacted |
|
1AC |
the only speech that is prepared ahead of time |
|
shell format |
a skeleton of the arguments that can be expanded upon in later speeches |
|
front lines |
pre-prepared lines that are written in anticipation of what the neg's shell will say |
|
flowing |
particular style of note taking used in debate rounds |
|
negative block |
2NC and the 1NR |
|
cite |
source of information |
|
claim |
statement that you are asking the other person to accept |
|
grounds |
is the basis of real persuasion and is made up of data and hard facts |
|
warrant |
links data to a claim |
|
inherency |
argues that currently the status quo is not solving the resolution and cannot without fundamental changes |
|
significance |
refers to the substantially of the problem |
|
harm |
shows that there is some type of damage being done because of the problem |
|
debate team |
consists of two people |
|
line by line |
the way debaters make arguments |
|
evidence |
reinforces the argument and should not be taken out of context to insure the author's intent |
|
solvency |
argues that the aff's plan solves the case and advantages to the plan's implenmentation |
|
solvency turn |
argues that the solvency is bad and will lead to a negative impact |
|
solvency takeout |
argues that the solvency is ineffective |
|
plan meet need |
argues that the aff plan does not take into account other factors that hinder your solvency or advantage |
|
alternate causality |
other issues that will cause the negative impact, proving that the aff plan does not cause the negative plan |
|
topicality |
is that the aff case must fall within the boundaries of the resolution |
|
stock issues |
this type of judge looks at whether or not the aff upholds the 5 stock issues |
|
policymaker |
this type of judge will vote for the best policy |
|
Tabula Rasa |
referring to the unformed, featureless mind in the philosophy of John Locke, this judge claims to listen to and vote for any arguement advanced in the round |