| Term | Definition |
|
economics |
social science concerned with the efficient use of scarce resources to achieve the maximum satisfaction of economic wants |
|
scarcity |
limits options and necessitates that we make choices because, "we can't have it all." |
|
"no free lunch" |
there is always a cost to someone-ultimately to society |
|
opportunity cost |
to get more of one thing, you forgo the opportunity of getting something else. cost of that which you get is the value of that which is sacrificed to obtain it. |
|
rational self-interest |
individuals pursue actions that will enable them to achieve their greatest satisfaction |
|
rational self-interest (3 impl) |
1. individuals will make different choices under different circumstances 2. different individuals will make different choices 3. rational decisions may change as costs and benefits change |
|
marginal analysis |
comparisons of marginal costs and marginal benefits |
|
marginal |
extra, additional, "a change in" |
|
marginal analysis (3 impl) |
1. each option involves marginal benefits and, bc of scarce resources, marginal costs. 2. marginal benefit always includes marginal cost of forgoing smtg else. 3."too much": goods obtained beyond point where marginal cost equals marginal benefit (alternatives are more valuable at the margin) |
|
law/principle |
well tested and widely accepted theory |
|
theory |
tested hypothesis that returns favorable results |
|
model |
simplified representations of how smtg works. incorporates combinations of laws or principles |
|
theoretical economics |
process of deriving theories and principles. systematically arrange facts (cause and effect order), interpret and generalize from them. |
|
economic theories/principles |
statements about economic behavior or the economy that enable prediction of the probable effects of certain actions. |
|
analytical economics |
the ascertaining of cause and effect, of action and outcome, within the economic system. |
|
generalization (3 impl) |
1. theories, principles and laws are imprecise because econ facts are usually diverse. 2. no 2 individuals or institutions will act exactly the same. 3. econ principles are expressed as the tendencies of typical or average consumers, workers or business firms |
|
ceteris paribus |
other-things-equal assumption |
|
ceteris paribus (impl) |
assumption that all other variables except those under immediate consideration are held constant for a particular analysis |
|
abstraction (impl) |
econ principles, or theories, are simplifications that omit irrelevant facts or circumstances. models do not mirror full complexity of the real world. (maps) |
|
policy economics |
recognizes that theories and data can be used to formulate courses of action based on principles and intended to solve a specific problem or further an economic goal. |
|
economic goals |
1. growth 2. full employ 3. efficiency 4. price-level stability 5. freedom 6. equitable distribution of income 7. security 8. balance of trade |
|
tradeoffs |
mutually exclusive goals demand that, to achieve one, we must sacrifice another |
|
aggregate |
collection of specific economic units treated as if they were one unit |
|
macroeconomics |
examines the economy as a whole or its basic subdivisions or aggregates, such as gov't, household and business sectors. |
|
microeconomics |
examines specific economic units, such as an indiviual industry, firm or household. |
|
positive economics |
focuses on facts and cause-and-effect relationships. Includes description, theory development, and theory testing (theoretical econ). Avoids value judgments and tries to establish scientific statements about econ behaviour. "what is" |
|
normative economics |
incorporates value judgements about what an economy should be like or what particular policy actions should be recommended to achieve a desirable goal. (policy economics) "what should be." |
|
fallacy of composition |
assumption that what is true for one individual or part of a whole is necessarily true for a group of individulas or the whole. generalizations valid at one level of analysis may or may not be valid at the other. (view from bleachers) |
|
post hoc, ergo propter hoc (fallacy) |
"after this, therefore because of this." rooster crows at dawn, but doesn't cause the sun to rise. |
|
correlation |
that two events or two sets of data are associated in some sytematic or dependable way. |
|
induction |
operation of the mind by which we infer that what we know to be true in a particular case or cases will be true in all cases that resemble the former in certain assignable respects |
|
deduction |
inference by reasoning from generals to particulars |