Quizlet
or
There are no sets in this subject.
No groups found.
| gibbons v. ogden definitions | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| # | Definition | Sets | |
| 1 | regulating interstate commerce is a power reserved to the federal government | 6 sets | |
| 2 | supreme court decision that ruled that the constitution gave control of interstate commerce to the u.s. congress, not the individual states through which a route passed. | 6 sets | |
| 3 | steamboat case, state of ny tried to grant a private concern a monopoly of waterborne commerce between ny and nj...developed interstate trade | 5 sets | |
| 4 | a case that arose from an attempt by new york state to grant a monopoly of steamboat operation between new york and new jersey. ogden was licensed to operate the ferry and argued that navigation commerce was a state regulated thing, but gibbons had his own ferry business incensed by a statue enacted by congress. the court disagreed with ogden claiming that congress had as much power over commerce as navigation. this established a broad interpretation of the constitution. | 4 sets | |
| 5 | 1824 - this case ruled that only the federal government has authority over interstate commerce. | 4 sets | |
| 6 | 1824--clarified the commerce clause and affirmed congressional power over interstate commerce. | 4 sets | |
| 7 | a landmark case decided in 1824 in which the supreme court interpreted very broadly the clause in article i, section 8, of the constitution giving congress the power to regular interstate commerce, encompassing virtually every from of commercial activity. | 3 sets | |
| 8 | canal bween nj & ny, taxing ships from other states 4 use, establishes that congress alone has control of interstate commerce | 2 sets | |
| 9 | said that the power to regulate interstate navigation was granted by the commerce clause | 2 sets | |
| 10 | court strengthened congress's power to regulate interstate commerce. the stae of ny had granted fulton and livingston rights to carry passangers on the hudson to nyc. they gave the rights to ogden. gibbons also had a license, under an act of congress, and began competing with ogden for ferry trade. ogden took him to court and won in ny courts. gibbons to the case to the supreme court and won. marshall said that the power of congress to regulate interstate commerce was complete in itself. | 2 sets | |
| 11 | (jmon) interstate commerce, in this marshall court case, the u.s. supreme court invalidated a state monopoly and reaffirmed congress' power to oversee commerce between states. of all the cases that have interpreted the scope of congressional power under the commerce clause, none has been more important than this "steamboat case." the case established a basic precedent because it paved the way for later federal regulation of transportation, communication, buying and selling, and manufacturing. today, little economic activity remains outside the regulatory power of congress. | 2 sets | |
| 12 | "steamboat case". interstate commerce & transportation is dealt by congress. | 2 sets | |
| 13 | a case that arose from an attempt by new york state to grant a monopoly of steamboat operation between new york and new jersey. ogden was licensed to operate the ferry and argued that navigation commerce was a state regulated thing, but gibbons had his own ferry business incensed by a statue enacted by congress. the court disagreed with ogden claiming that congress had as much power over commerce as navigation. this established a broad interpretation of the constitution. | 2 sets | |
| 14 | a landmark case decided in 1824 in which the supreme court interpreted very broadly the clause in article i, section 8, of the constitution giving congress the power to regulate interstate commerce, encompassing virtually every form of commercial activity. | 2 sets | |
| 15 | (1824) in this case the supreme court gave a wide definition to congress' power to "regulate commerce... among the several states." | 2 sets | |
| 16 | in this case the supreme court gave a wide definition to congress' power to "regulate commerce... among the several states." | 2 sets | |
| 17 | supreme court decision that ruled that the constitution gave control of interstate commerce to the u.s. congress, not the individual states which a route passed. | 2 sets | |
| 18 | recognized federal government's authority over interstate trade | 2 sets | |
| 19 | ruled that only the federal government has authority over interstate commerce; new york passed a law allowing monopoly on steamship travel to certain people, including aaron ogden. yet, thomas gibbons who wanted to use these waterways and was given federal permission to do so, was denied in new york. caused marshall to use influence to determine federal government over state. | 2 sets | |
| 20 | 0 | 2 sets | |
| 21 | supreme court case that decided if the government had the right to regulate converse between the states | 2 sets | |
| 22 | a landmark case in 1824 in which the supreme court expanded congress's power to regulate interstate commerce, encompassing virtually every form of commercial activity | 2 sets | |
| 23 | court strengthened federal government - only congress could regulate interstate commerce | 2 sets | |
| 24 | about a monopoly on steamboat operations on the new york river, the government ruled that the supremacy clause gave the federal government all rights to interstate commerce and navigation. | 2 sets | |
| 25 | gives defined boarders for implied powers in the consti | 1 set | |
| 26 | upheld power of federal government to control trade, states cannot impeed on federal power | 1 set | |
| 27 | a landmark case in which the supreme court interpreted freely the clause in the constitution which gives congress the power to regulate interstate commerce | 1 set | |
| 28 | congress had power to regulate interstate commerce | 1 set | |
| 29 | this supreme court decision forbade states from enacting any legislation that would interfere with1924, congress's right to regulate commerce among the separate states. | 1 set | |
| 30 | a landmark case decided in 1824 in which the supreme court interpreted very broadly the clause in article i, section 8, of the constitution giving congress the power to regulate interstate commerce, encompassing virtually every form of commercial activity | 1 set | |
| 31 | congress had the right to regulate interstate commerce | 1 set | |
| 32 | a landmark case decided in 1824 in which the supreme court interpreted very broadly the clause in article i, section 8, of the constitution giving congress the power to regulate interstate commerce, encompassing virtually every form of commercial activity. the commerce clause had been the constitutional basis for much of congress's regulation of the economy | 1 set | |
| 33 | competitive trading venture. (not a contract case). intersetate commerce under federal authority, not state. states cannot restrict interstate commerce by state contracts. | 1 set | |
| 34 | 1824, supreme ct. case-expanded congress' power to regulate interstate and international commerce by defining commerce very broadly to incorporate every form of commercial activity | 1 set | |
| 35 | new york and new jersey ferry case. federal court one because of the supremecy clause | 1 set | |
| 36 | this case involved the issue of interstate commerce | 1 set | |
| 37 | broadened the meaning of inter-state commerce | 1 set | |
| 38 | 1824 est. federal power of regulating interstate commerce. new york gives exclusive water rights to aaron ogden to provide service across hudson river to new jersey. thomas gibbons holds a federal license to transport goods court upholds gibbon's claim. | 1 set | |
| 39 | (1824) clarified the commerce clause and affirmed congressional power over interstate commerce. | 1 set | |
| 40 | clarified the commerce clause and affirmed congressional power over interstate commerce. | 1 set | |