Quizlet
or
There are no sets in this subject.
No groups found.
| gibbons v. ogden definitions | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| # | Definition | Sets | |
| 1 | supreme court decision that ruled that the constitution gave control of interstate commerce to the u.s. congress, not the individual states through which a route passed. | 6 sets | |
| 2 | regulating interstate commerce is a power reserved to the federal government | 6 sets | |
| 3 | steamboat case, state of ny tried to grant a private concern a monopoly of waterborne commerce between ny and nj...developed interstate trade | 5 sets | |
| 4 | 1824--clarified the commerce clause and affirmed congressional power over interstate commerce. | 4 sets | |
| 5 | a landmark case decided in 1824 in which the supreme court interpreted very broadly the clause in article i, section 8, of the constitution giving congress the power to regular interstate commerce, encompassing virtually every from of commercial activity. | 3 sets | |
| 6 | a case that arose from an attempt by new york state to grant a monopoly of steamboat operation between new york and new jersey. ogden was licensed to operate the ferry and argued that navigation commerce was a state regulated thing, but gibbons had his own ferry business incensed by a statue enacted by congress. the court disagreed with ogden claiming that congress had as much power over commerce as navigation. this established a broad interpretation of the constitution. | 2 sets | |
| 7 | in this case the supreme court gave a wide definition to congress' power to "regulate commerce... among the several states." | 2 sets | |
| 8 | canal bween nj & ny, taxing ships from other states 4 use, establishes that congress alone has control of interstate commerce | 2 sets | |
| 9 | (1824) in this case the supreme court gave a wide definition to congress' power to "regulate commerce... among the several states." | 2 sets | |
| 10 | court strengthened congress's power to regulate interstate commerce. the stae of ny had granted fulton and livingston rights to carry passangers on the hudson to nyc. they gave the rights to ogden. gibbons also had a license, under an act of congress, and began competing with ogden for ferry trade. ogden took him to court and won in ny courts. gibbons to the case to the supreme court and won. marshall said that the power of congress to regulate interstate commerce was complete in itself. | 2 sets | |
| 11 | about a monopoly on steamboat operations on the new york river, the government ruled that the supremacy clause gave the federal government all rights to interstate commerce and navigation. | 2 sets | |
| 12 | court strengthened federal government - only congress could regulate interstate commerce | 2 sets | |
| 13 | a case that arose from an attempt by new york state to grant a monopoly of steamboat operation between new york and new jersey. ogden was licensed to operate the ferry and argued that navigation commerce was a state regulated thing, but gibbons had his own ferry business incensed by a statue enacted by congress. the court disagreed with ogden claiming that congress had as much power over commerce as navigation. this established a broad interpretation of the constitution. | 2 sets | |
| 14 | a landmark case decided in 1824 in which the supreme court interpreted very broadly the clause in article i, section 8, of the constitution giving congress the power to regulate interstate commerce, encompassing virtually every form of commercial activity. | 2 sets | |
| 15 | said that the power to regulate interstate navigation was granted by the commerce clause | 2 sets | |
| 16 | supreme court decision that ruled that the constitution gave control of interstate commerce to the u.s. congress, not the individual states which a route passed. | 2 sets | |
| 17 | ruled that only the federal government has authority over interstate commerce; new york passed a law allowing monopoly on steamship travel to certain people, including aaron ogden. yet, thomas gibbons who wanted to use these waterways and was given federal permission to do so, was denied in new york. caused marshall to use influence to determine federal government over state. | 2 sets | |
| 18 | (jmon) interstate commerce, in this marshall court case, the u.s. supreme court invalidated a state monopoly and reaffirmed congress' power to oversee commerce between states. of all the cases that have interpreted the scope of congressional power under the commerce clause, none has been more important than this "steamboat case." the case established a basic precedent because it paved the way for later federal regulation of transportation, communication, buying and selling, and manufacturing. today, little economic activity remains outside the regulatory power of congress. | 2 sets | |
| 19 | recognized federal government's authority over interstate trade | 2 sets | |
| 20 | supreme court case that decided if the government had the right to regulate converse between the states | 2 sets | |
| 21 | a landmark case in 1824 in which the supreme court expanded congress's power to regulate interstate commerce, encompassing virtually every form of commercial activity | 2 sets | |
| 22 | 1824; government controlled interstate trade | 1 set | |
| 23 | broadened the meaning of inter-state commerce | 1 set | |
| 24 | asserts congressional control over interstate commerce | 1 set | |
| 25 | upheld power of federal government to control trade, states cannot impeed on federal power | 1 set | |
| 26 | this case involved the issue of interstate commerce | 1 set | |
| 27 | gives defined boarders for implied powers in the consti | 1 set | |
| 28 | new york and new jersey ferry case. federal court one because of the supremecy clause | 1 set | |
| 29 | an 1824 case in which the supreme court upheld the powwer of the federal government to regulate interstate commerce | 1 set | |
| 30 | supreme court upheld broad congressional power to regulate interstate commerce; broad interpretation of the constitution's commerce clause paved the way for later rulings | 1 set | |
| 31 | congress controlls interstate commerce 1824 | 1 set | |
| 32 | 1824. marshall's last great decision. clause of constitution empowering congress to regulate commerce w/ foreign nations and among states. federal supremacy over state decisions. about steamboats. | 1 set | |
| 33 | established a broad interpretation of the commerce clause; determined congress power encompassed virtually every form of commercial acivity. the commerce clause has been the constitutional basis for much of congress' regulation of the economy. | 1 set | |
| 34 | established a broad interpretation of the commerce clause; determined congres' power encompassed virtually every form of commercial activity. the commerce clause has been the constitutional basis for much of congress' regulation of the economy | 1 set | |
| 35 | congress can grant licenses to interstate steamboat operators, even if conflicts with state law. commerce is "intercourse," includes navigation. among the states means concerning more states than one. congress has plenary power to regulate commerce, so states can't interfere. (1824) | 1 set | |
| 36 | states try to tax other states ships in canal between ny and nj. establishes that interstate commerce can only be regulated by the federal government | 1 set | |
| 37 | which court case addressed the issue of interstate commerce? | 1 set | |
| 38 | 1824; gibbons had new york boating liscense to boat, ogden had federal liscense; court ruled for ogden which expanded their control over interstate commerce | 1 set | |
| 39 | (1824) established the concept of federal control over intrusive commerce | 1 set | |
| 40 | 1824; established the concept of federal control of interstate commerce | 1 set | |