5 Written Questions

1. NO racial gerrymandering; race cannot be the sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative boundaries; majority-minority districts.
2. If a defendant cannot afford an attorney the state must provide one
3. Race can be used as a factor for admission into a public law school as long as the policy is "narrowly tailored"
4. Hand-counting in Florida was a violation of Equal Protection clause, made George W. Bush the winner of the 2000 election
5. Abortion rights fall within the privacy implied in the 14th amendment

5 Matching Questions

1. U.S. V Nixon
2. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1987)
3. Clinton V Jones
4. Marbury V Madison
5. Mapp V Ohio

1. a This case establishes the Supreme Court's power of Judicial Review
2. b "Executive privilege" is not unlimited
3. c More leeway for states in regulation abortion, though no overturning of Roe v. Wade. Upholds MO law prohibiting abortion in public hospitals; shift in composition of court. (Later cases allow 24-hour waiting periods, parental consent for minors, etc.)
4. d A sitting president is not immune to civil litigation except in extraordinary circumstances
5. e Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)

5 Multiple Choice Questions

1. Outlawed Missouri Compromise. Denial of slavery was a 5th amendment property violation. Blacks were NOT citizens
   1. Dred Scott 1857
   2. Brown V Board 1954
   3. U.S. Lopez 1995
   4. Roe V Wade 1973
2. Prohibited states from banning the teaching of evolution.
   1. Texas V Johnson 1984
   2. Plessy V Ferguson 1896
   3. Gideon V Wainright 1963
   4. Epperson V Arkansas 1968
3. The accused must be notified of their rights before being questioned by the police
   1. Miller V California
   2. Marbury V Madison
   3. Miranda V Arizona
   4. Mapp V Ohio
4. One person one vote-state elections (Warren Court’s judicial activism.)
   1. Buckley V Valeo
   2. Baker V Carr
   3. Mapp V Ohio
   4. Engle V Vitale
5. Mandatory prayer in schools is a violation of the establishment clause
   1. Buckley V Valeo
   2. Engle V Vitale
   3. U.S. V Nixon
   4. Baker V Carr

5 True/False Question

1. Korematsu v. U.S. → The court ruled that the ordering of Japanese=Americans into internment camps was constitutional
   

   True        False

2. Regents of California V Bakke → Race can not be the only factor in college admissions, there can be no quotas.
   

   True        False

3. New York Times V Sullivan → Law must be clearly secular, not prohibiting or inhibiting religion, and there should be no excessive entanglement
   

   True        False

4. Reno V ACLU 1996 → Federal law designed to prohibit "indecency" on the internet was unconstitutional
   

   True        False

5. Lemon V Kurtzman → Established the authority of the court to review state criminal cases on appeal
   

   True        False