Show Symbols

5 Written Questions

1. footlocker with pot was confiscated and searched later - unconstitutional because no probable cause and not in the presence of the owner
2. beachfront properties - one was taken away - they didn't want to compensate but they had to
3. bugerlry - trial with no black representation which is outlawed by the 14th
4. it was believed that harris was selling moonshine with no taxes because of a tip from an informant it was seized - turns out the warrent wasn't rational
5. was conviced of narcotics by an automotated device used during an interview - it was determined that it was constitutional

5 Matching Questions

1. Terry v. Ohio
2. Cali v. Carney
3. Mapp v. Ohio
4. Brewer v. Williams
5. Katz v. US

1. a was believed to have lewd material in her home and was forced to sit and watch as they went through her things - unreasonable due to exclusionary rule
2. b was arrested in a kidnapping in another county, while driving back to the county where the kidnapping was the cops coaxed the location of the body out of his it was custodial so it was unconstitutional (christian faith)
3. c gambeling on a payphone - established that the 4th amendment is for people not just places - established the time ridden test
4. d a moter home was searched due to a tip with sex and drungs with out a warrent - it was permissible because the motor home was fully mobeil
5. e men were walking suspiciously up and down a street several times - a cop stoped and frisked them - it's constitutional because a pat down is fine if the cop see's suspicious reasoning

5 Multiple Choice Questions

1. he was identified in a lineup and it was question whether his lawyer should be there - the 6th gives councel of trial not lineup becaue in trial people dont' really understand the procedures
   1. US. V. Leon
   2. Katz v. US
   3. US. v. White
   4. US v. Ash
2. survaliance was set up to follow him because of a tip given by an informant - the agulian test was created because of it
   1. Katz v. US
   2. Spinelli v. US
   3. Chimel v. Cali
   4. Griffin v. Cali
3. chose to not testfy his guilt at his hearing - the jurrors were told to suppose that he was guilty because he wasn't there -this is unconstitutional because of the self incrimination clause
   1. Faretta v. Cali
   2. Griffin v. Cali
   3. Chimel v. Cali
   4. Cali v. Carney
4. was convicted of kidnapping and said that the jury wasn't fair because there was not women - it was unconstitutional
   1. Taylor v. Louisiana
   2. Terry v. Ohio
   3. Miranda v. Arizona
   4. Brewer v. Williams
5. girl smoking in the bathroom at school - the principle searches her purse and it's ok because of the reasonable suspicion test
   1. Terry v. Ohio
   2. New Jersey v. TLO
   3. Spinelli v. US
   4. New York v. Quarles

5 True/False Question

1. Chimel v. Cali → Chimel was arrested and the police office went through his home to look for a gun - the search was unconstitutional becasue the officer went far beyond the area that the gun would most likley be
   

   True        False

2. New York v. Quarles → a moter home was searched due to a tip with sex and drungs with out a warrent - it was permissible because the motor home was fully mobeil
   

   True        False

3. Faretta v. Cali → he was charged with car theft and wanted to represent himself - at first it was ok then later they retracted it and appointed him a lawyer - he thought he should get to pick out a lawyer - the common law rule was inplace and it couldn't happen
   

   True        False

4. Robertson v. Arizona → miranda was arrested and not aware of his rights - all of the evidence was thrown out because of self incrimination
   

   True        False

5. Kelo v. City of New London → due to poor economic conditions the city wanted to turn some residential areas into commercial areas- people believed that commercial areas were not public but they are because their intentions were for the best of the economy.
   

   True        False