5 Written Questions

1. Breaking and entering,stealing from property
2. Attorney representing the defendents who cannot afford private attorneys
3. Betrayal of ones country, providing aid to enemies
4. Accidental killing during unlawful,but not felonious act (ex DUI)
5. Can a state ban cross burning that is intended to intimidate? --- Cross burning is not allowed if it's intent is to intimidate. (article I)

5 Matching Questions

1. U.S. v Nixon
2. Due Process
3. Exclusionary Rule
4. Battery
5. Korematsu v U.S.

1. a Unlawful application of force (touching)
2. b Does the president have executive privilege to keep information from congress (i.e...the tapes) --- President has more rights than a normal citizen btu it must involve national defense issues.
3. c Rule that evidence illegally gathered by law enforcement officers may not be used against a defendant in trial.
4. d Did a Japanese-American, have to go to internment camp during WWII? --- Ruled not discrimination because he disobeyed order to go to camp. Valid under war powers of constitution. (14th)
5. e Gov.t must act fairly and follow the same fair rules in all cases brought to trial

5 Multiple Choice Questions

1. Is the death penalty a violation of the 8th? --- No, the death penalty does not violate the 8th or 14th
   1. Bush v Gore
   2. Gregg v Georgia
   3. Plea Bargain
   4. Roe v Wade
2. Does the 1st protect statements against the war effort during war (passing out anti-war fliers during war) ? --- Not proctected speech.Case established clear and present danger of whether gov't can limit speech.
   1. Schenck v U.S.
   2. Katz v U.S.
   3. Kyllo v U.S.
   4. Korematsu v U.S.
3. Are laws against interracial marriage a violation of the 14th ----Yes, laws against interrracial marriages violate the 14th
   1. Terry v Ohio
   2. Roe v Wade
   3. Loving v VA
   4. Schenck v U.S.
4. Formal complaint before a grand jury which charges the accused with one or more crimes.
   1. Robbery
   2. Indictment
   3. Battery
   4. Bail
5. Is a defendant entitled to a state appointed attorney if they cannot afford one? --- Yes, defendant has the right to a state apppointed attorney if the defendant cannot afford one.
   1. Baker v Carr
   2. Gregg v Georgia
   3. Roe v Wade
   4. Gideon v Wainwright

5 True/False Question

1. Katz v U.S. → Can the government bug public telephones or is it a violation of the 4th --- No, a search warrant is necessary.
   

   True        False

2. Kyllo v U.S. → Is is a violation of the 4th for law enforcement to use thermal imaging deviceis to scan for marijauana? --- Yes, it was an illegal search and va iolation of the 4th.
   

   True        False

3. Assault → Fear of touching or causing harm
   

   True        False

4. Miranda v Arizona → The accused denied his 5th rights because he was not told them? --- Yes, statements made by accused person who have not been informed of rights may not be used in court.
   

   True        False

5. Renard Atkins v VA → Can a mentally retarded convict get the death penalty? --- No you can't use the death penalty on a mentally retarded convict (8th)
   

   True        False