5 Written questions
5 Matching questions
- Punitive Damages
- Void for Vagueness
- Two factors a court will consider when examining the questions of reckless disregard for the truth?
- Five Elements of Libel action
- a Designed to punish defendants for misconduct
- b PIDFF, Publication, Identification, Defamation, Falsity, Fault
- c It's too vague, if the common person does not know what behavior is prohibited.
- d Whether or not the news was of public concern and if the news came from a reliable source
- e A civil Wrong for which a court can offer a remedy . usually (money)
5 Multiple choice questions
- An "inherit right" the privacy is everywhere and no where in the constitution
- 1. That the parody or satire amounted to a statement of fact, not opinion.
2.That it was a false statement of fact.
3.That the person who drew the cartoon or wrote the article knew it was false, or exhibited reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of the material. that is proof of actual malice is necessary.
- Carelessness, not using care
- Immunity for online publishers under the (CDA) No provider of an interactive computer service shall be treated as publisher ( Internet providers are treated differently from publishers of print, t.v., and radio)
5 True/False questions
Common Law Defenses → It's too vague, if the common person does not know what behavior is prohibited.
True or False? A person who was considered a public figure in connection with a public controversy remains a public figure with regard to stories published or broadcast about that controversy in the future, despite the passage of time. → False
Ollman test → Determines whether a statement of opinion is true or false
Hornby v. Hunter → information that is transfer form newspaper and tv over the internet the court will presume 3rd party is aware.
Public Official → Must prove actual malice. A person who has done something to influence public opinion on a particular issue