Like this study set? Create a free account to save it.

Sign up for an account

Already have a Quizlet account? .

Create an account

McCulloch v. Maryland

Congress has implied powers to perform its enumerated duties that come from the Necessary and Proper Clause

Facts: challenge whether Fed Gov't had power to est a bank

Holding: this power is implied

-The power specifically enumerated implies other means
-Const does not exclude implied powers
-Amendment 10 assured states wouldn't cede too much power, but doesn't preclude implied Fed powers
-Necessary and proper clause - Fed gov't must have power to do what's necessary & proper to fulfill its enumerated powers
-Meaning of necessary:
--Broad - gives Cong discretion on furthering & realizing its enumerated powers
--Some power of review reserved for courts

Dormant Commerce Clause

When Cong has not enacted legislation, can state reg commerce?

Extreme approaches - Gibbons & Blackbird Creek
Middle approach - Cooley (states may reg if it doesn't impose an unacceptable burden on interstate commerce

No apparent Const'l justification for DCC

Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona

Safety interests have to be ligitimate to permit states to regulate interstate commerce

AZ req'd shorter train lengths than surrounding states, claiming it was in the interest of safety

Holding: req was struck down

Not really a safety benefit
Need uniformity in RR's

Gibbons v. Ogden

States may not regulate commerce among the several states

Facts: Conflict btwn state monopoly run steamboars & federally licensed interstate steamboar company

1) Commerce includes navigation
2) Power to regulate commerce is not concurrent btwn federal & state
3) States may regulate commerce & movement of goods under police power - for safety of its people

Cooley v. Board of Wardens

States may regulate areas of interstate commerce that are local in nature & do not demand uniformity across the country

Facts: Philly req'd local licensed pilots to navigate its ports

No need for national uniformity. Possible reasons:
1) Local rules maximize interstate commerce
2) Local rules have no effect on interstate commerce
3) LR's consider local necessities

SC State HW Dept. v. Barnwell Brothers, Inc

Local interests can overcome burden on interstate commerce

SC limited width & weight of trucks on its HW's its roads weren't designed for heavier trucks

Please allow access to your computer’s microphone to use Voice Recording.

Having trouble? Click here for help.

We can’t access your microphone!

Click the icon above to update your browser permissions and try again


Reload the page to try again!


Press Cmd-0 to reset your zoom

Press Ctrl-0 to reset your zoom

It looks like your browser might be zoomed in or out. Your browser needs to be zoomed to a normal size to record audio.

Please upgrade Flash or install Chrome
to use Voice Recording.

For more help, see our troubleshooting page.

Your microphone is muted

For help fixing this issue, see this FAQ.

Star this term

You can study starred terms together

Voice Recording