5 Written questions
5 Matching questions
- Heart of Atlanta Motel v. US
- City of Boerne v. Flores
- Gratz v. Bollinger
- Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
- Brandenburg v. Ohio
- a Congress lacked the power to define religious freedom of the 1st amendment.
- b Established exclusionary rule; illegally obtained evidence cannot be used in court; Warren Court's judicial activism.
- c a United States Supreme Court case regarding the University of Michigan undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy
- d the U.S. Congress could use the Constitution's Commerce Clause power to force private businesses to abide by the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
- e 1969--Determined that a law that proscribes advocacy of violence for political reform is constitutional if applied to speech that is not directed toward producing imminent lawlessness and is not likely to produce such action is not constitutional.
5 Multiple choice questions
- White primaries are unconstitutional.
- Establishment clause that government may not compose official prayers to recite as a part of a religious program carried on by government.
- 1966 ruling that upon arrest, a suspect has the right to remain silent and the right to consult with a lawyer.
- a case in which the United States Supreme Court upheld the affirmative action admissions policy of the University of Michigan Law School.
- a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution protected students from being forced to salute the American flag and say the Pledge of Allegiance in school.
5 True/False questions
Gideon v. Wainwright → White primaries are unconstitutional.
Furman v. Georgia (1972) → Established exclusionary rule; illegally obtained evidence cannot be used in court; Warren Court's judicial activism.
U.S. v. Lopez (1995) → Gun Free School Zones Act exceeded Congress' authority to regulate interstate commerce.
Plessy v. Ferguson → 1971 defining government actionsin dealing with religion--must not inhibit or advance religion and does not entangle the goverment with religion.
Griswold v. Connecticut → 1963 ruling that a defendant in a felony trial must be provided a lawyer free of charge if the defendant cannot afford one.