BLAW Ch 4
torts and cyber torts
Terms in this set (43)
what is a tort?
A civil wrong not arising from a breach of contract; a breach of a legal duty that proximately causes harm or injury to another.
what is the purpose of tort law? What are two basic categories of torts?
the purpose of tort law is to provide remedies for the invasion of various protected interests. the two classifications of torts are intentional and unintentional torts.
what are the four elements of negligence?
1. That the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff. 2. That the defendant breached that duty. 3. That the plaintiff suffered a legally recognizable injury. 4. That the defendant's breach caused the plaintiff's injury.
what is meant by strict liability? In what circumstances is strict liability applied?
Liability regardless of fault. In tort law, strict liability is imposed on those engaged in abnormally dangerous activities, on persons who keep dangerous animals, and on manufacturers or sellers that introduce into commerce goods that are unreasonably dangerous when in a defective condition.
What is a cyber tort, and how are tort theories being applied in cyberspace?
a tort committed in cyberspace. tort theories which apply to cyberspace are those of defamation, which is complicated by the anonymity of the internet. in order to prosecute, a court order if often necessary to get an ISP to reveal the identity of the source of the comments.
Capable of serving as the basis of a lawsuit. An actionable claim can be pursued in a lawsuit or other court action.
The deliberate intent to cause harm, which exists when a person makes a statement either knowing that it is false or showing a reckless disregard for whether it is true. In a defamation suit, a statement made about a public figure normally must be made with actual malice for the plaintiff to recover damages.
In tort law, the use by one person of another person's name, likeness, or other identifying characteristic without permission and for the benefit of the user.
Any word or action intended to make another person fearful of immediate physical harm; a reasonably believable threat.
assumption of risk
A doctrine under which a plaintiff may not recover for injuries or damage suffered from risks he or she knows of and has voluntarily assumed.
the unexcused, harmful or offensive, intentional touching of another.
A person, such as a customer or a client, who is invited onto business premises by the owner of those premises for business purposes.
Wrongful interference with another's business rights.
causation in fact
An act or omission without which an event would not have occurred.
A rule in tort law that reduces the plaintiff's recovery in proportion to the plaintiff's degree of fault, rather than barring recovery completely; used in the majority of states.
A monetary award equivalent to the actual value of injuries or damages sustained by the aggrieved party.
A rule in tort law that completely bars the plaintiff from recovering any damages if the damage suffered is partly the plaintiff's own fault; used in a minority of states.
Wrongfully taking or retaining possession of an individual's personal property and placing it in the service of another.
Money sought as a remedy for a breach of contract or for a tortious act.
Anything published or publicly spoken that causes injury to another's good name, reputation, or character.
A reason offered and alleged by a defendant in an action or suit as to why the plaintiff should not recover or establish what she or he seeks.
disparagement of property
An economically injurious falsehood made about another's product or property; a general term for torts that are more specifically referred to as slander of quality or slander of title.
dram shop act
A state statute that imposes liability on the owners of bars and taverns, as well as those who serve alcoholic drinks to the public, for injuries resulting from accidents caused by intoxicated persons when the sellers or servers of alcoholic drinks contributed to the intoxication.
duty of care
The duty of all persons, as established by tort law, to exercise a reasonable amount of care in their dealings with others. Failure to exercise due care, which is normally determined by the reasonable person standard, constitutes the tort of negligence.
Any misrepresentation, either by misstatement or by omission of a material fact, knowingly made with the intention of deceiving another and on which a reasonable person would and does rely to his or her detriment.
good samaritan statute
A state statute stipulating that persons who provide emergency services to, or rescue, someone in peril cannot be sued for negligence, unless they act recklessly, thereby causing further harm.
A wrongful act knowingly committed.
Defamation in writing or other form having the quality of permanence (such as a digital recording).
Professional misconduct or the failure to exercise the requisite degree of skill as a professional. Negligence—the failure to exercise due care—on the part of a professional, such as a physician or an attorney, is commonly referred to as malpractice.
The failure to exercise the standard of care that a reasonable person would exercise in similar circumstances.
negligence per se
An action or failure to act in violation of a statutory requirement.
A legal right, exemption, or immunity granted to a person or a class of persons. In the context of defamation, an absolute privilege immunizes the person making the statements from a lawsuit, regardless of whether the statements were malicious.
Legal cause; exists when the connection between an act and an injury is strong enough to justify imposing liability.
A salesperson's often exaggerated claims concerning the quality of property offered for sale. Such claims involve opinions rather than facts and are not considered to be legally binding promises or warranties.
Monetary damages that may be awarded to a plaintiff to punish the defendant and deter similar conduct in the future, and to set an example for others.
reasonable person standard
The standard of behavior expected of a hypothetical "reasonable person"; the standard against which negligence is measured and that must be observed to avoid liability for negligence.
res ipsa loquitur
A doctrine under which negligence may be inferred simply because an event occurred, if it is the type of event that would not occur in the absence of negligence. Literally, the term means "the facts speak for themselves."
Defamation in oral form.
slander of quality (trade libel)
the publication of false information about another's product, alleging that it is not what its seller claims.
slander of title
the publication of a statement that denies or casts doubt on another's legal ownership of any property, causing financial loss to that property's owner.
One who commits a tort.
trespass to land
The entry onto, above, or below the surface of land owned by another without the owner's permission or legal authorization.
trespass to personal property
The unlawful taking or harming of another's personal property; interference with another's right to the exclusive possession of his or her personal property.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE...
EMS Administrative Essentials | EMSKnowledgeCheck Guide
Business law Today ch 4
Business Law Chapter 5 Vocab
The Legal Environment Today Ch 5
OTHER SETS BY THIS CREATOR
Religion as global culture migration media and other transnational forces
Old And new religions the changing spiritual landscape
Ghosts souls and ancestors power of the dead
THIS SET IS OFTEN IN FOLDERS WITH...
BLAW ch 3
BLAW ch 1
BLAW Chp 2
BLaw Chp 2