5 Written questions
5 Matching questions
- Begging The Question
- Appeal to Unqualified Authority
- Hasty Generalization
- a leaving out a key premise, restating premise, ignoring the question. Includes circular reasoning
- b when the conclusion of an argument depends on the erroneous transference of an attribute from the parts of something to a whole
- c Draws a conclusion about a population based on a small sample (jumping to conclusions).
- d cited witness lacks credibility, there are some areas in which no one can be considered an authority, politics, morals, and religion
- e general rule is applied to a specific case it was not intended to cover
5 Multiple choice questions
- an informal fallacy that occurs when a single question that is really two or more questions is asked, and a single answer is applied to both questions
- A fallacy that introduces an irrelevant issue to divert attention from the subject under discussion
- arguer attempts to support conclusion by merely evoking pity.
- Attempts to convince you of something by claiming that you'll be accepted or valued if you believe it
- an informally fallacy that occurs when the premise of an argument entails one particular conclusion but a completely different conclusion is actually drawn
5 True/False questions
Equivocation → When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument, in order to create a fallacious conclusion
Straw Man → Erroneous transference of an attribute from a class onto its parts
Appeal to Ignorance → "to the stick" implied harm if person does not accept the conclusion, threat is logically irrelevant
False Dichotomy → Wrongly assumes a cause-and-effect relationship ('A' causes 'B' without proof that a relationship actually exists).
Suppressed Evidence → "to the stick" implied harm if person does not accept the conclusion, threat is logically irrelevant