Upgrade to remove ads
Terms in this set (31)
Loving v. Virginia
right to marry--black exile--established fundamental right to marry
Zablocki v. Redhail
right to marry--wanted marriage license but owed child support--couldnt get until he paid--he would never be able to pay, plus interest in promoting better parenting not enough
Stanley v. Illinois
right to custody--presumed unfit father--established right to custody of your own children
Michael H. v. Gerald D.
right to custody--slut wife--children born into marriage are children of the marriage. traditional standard
Moore v. City of East Cleveland
right to keep family together--grnamda lived with whole family--law said only immediate family--not okay--gov interest to prevent overcrowding not enough
Buck v. Bell
right to procreate--tried to sterilize based on eugenics--court said not okay--right to procreate
Skinner v. Oklahoma
right to procreate--sterilize repeat criminals--not okay, right to procreate
Griswold v. Connecticut
right to contraception--Dr. gave married couple contraceptives and was arrested, court said not okay, fundamental right to contraception.
Eisenstadt v. Baird
right to contraception--guy went and did college speeches and gave contraceptives to unmarried students...unmarried students still have right to contraception.
Carey v. Population Services
right to contraception--okay to give contraception to minors in high school--government interest to prevent teen pregnancy was a contradiction.
Roe v. Wade
right to abortion--before viability a woman has the fundamental right to choose to abort her pregnancy. Viability starts at end of first trimester.
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
right to abortion--established burden test--and requires spousal notification for abortion--NOT okay
Maher v. Roe
right to abortion--law limits state funding for medically necessary abortions only--OKAY
Harris v. McRae
right to abortion--law limits federal funding for medically necessary abortions only--OKAY
Planned Parenthood v. Dansforth
right to abortion--law requires spousal consent for abortion--NOT OKAY because consent serves as a veto to receive abortion if not acquired.
Bellotti v. Baird
right to abortion--parental consent required--this is okay if judge says kid is mature enough of for abortion without consent, or its in the best interest of the minor.
Bowers v. Hardwick
right to sex activity--no privacy for homo's
Lawrence v Texas
right to sex activity--overturned bowers--homo's get privacy for sex too in own home!
Obergefell v. Hodges
right to sex orientation--legalize homo marriage
Cruzan v. Directors, MO dept of health
right to refuse medical treatment--established clear and convincing evidence standard for removal of life support
Washington v. Glucksberg
right to refuse medical treatment--court says there is no fundamental right to physician assisted suicide
Vacco v. Quill
right to refuse medical treatment--right to refuse treatment is not the same as the right to physician assisted suicide because the physician has to physically do something to kill them.
Saenz v. Roe
right to travel--people wanted CA welfare and came from AZ, CA said not until 12 months....NOT OKAY--must be treated like a citizen from any state if you are from the US, right to travel....full faith and credit
Harper v. Virginia BOE
right to voting--$1.50 poll tax not okay because may serve as substantial burden
Kramer v. Union Free Schools
right to voting--property taxes--must own property to vote on school board in district--dude was staying with his parents--NOT okay because allows voting to some residents and not others.
Crawford v. Marion County
right to voting--law required photo ID to vote--yes thats okay because govt interest in voting fraud and not unduly burdensome
Reynolds v. Sims
right to voting--one person one vote--each house in the legislation must be apportioned based on population--OKAY
Boddie v. Connecticut
right to courts--wanted waiver for court divorce fee--court says fee not okay because people need courts to get divorced
US v. Kras
right to courts--P wanted a bankruptcy fee waiver--court said fee is okay because other methods to resolve debts available
Lewis v. Casey
right to courts--prisoners had bad law library--court said they are entitled to law library, BUT in this case they couldn't show sufficient injury
San Antonio School v. Rodriguez
established that there is NO fundamental right to education. Poor kids had bad schools, govt said too bad so sad.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE...
Amendments for CRJ test
In Our Defense Cases
In Our Defense Cases
OTHER SETS BY THIS CREATOR
laws/rules for small business cases
OTHER QUIZLET SETS
bio chp 1 learning objectives
Final Exam Review Guide 1
Human Sexuality pt 2