4 Written questions
4 Multiple choice questions
- (1999) Made "in plain view" rule. Guys bagging coke next to a window where a cop saw them.
- (1984) If effort to get a legitimate warrant was made in "good faith" then evidence is admissible.
- (1964) 6th Amendment applies during interrogation. (Escobedo is interrogated without lawyer and eventually confesses). S.C. rules interrogation illegal because lawyer wasn't present - Suspect's right to an attorney DURING police interrogation.
- (2000) Cops got anonymous call saying a guy had a gun illegally, but this wasn't enough probable cause to warrant a search. Conviction was thrown out.
4 True/False questions
Maryland v Garrison → (1987) "Honest Mistake" clause made when drugs were found with a warrant for a different location, but unintentionally.
Santana v US → (1976) "Hot Pursuit" clause made, meaning evidence is admissible if found during hot pursuit.
Nix v Williams → (1984) The evidence pertaining to the discovery and condition of the victim's body was properly admitted at respondent's second trial on the ground that it would ultimately or inevitably have been discovered even if no violation of any constitutional provision had taken place.
Weeks v US → (1914) Established exclusionary rule, evidence gotten without a warrant isn't admissable in a federal court