4 Written questions
4 Multiple choice questions
- (1964) 6th Amendment applies during interrogation. (Escobedo is interrogated without lawyer and eventually confesses). S.C. rules interrogation illegal because lawyer wasn't present - Suspect's right to an attorney DURING police interrogation.
- (1962) Gideon got charged for breaking into a pool hall. Justices required criminal courts to provide free legal counsel to those who could not afford it.
- (1987) "Honest Mistake" clause made when drugs were found with a warrant for a different location, but unintentionally.
- (1999) Made "in plain view" rule. Guys bagging coke next to a window where a cop saw them.
4 True/False questions
US v Leon → (1961) Person is searched and the cops find pornography(against Ohio law), but court found the evidence inadmissible. Exclusionary rule had to be binding on all state cases.
Santana v US → (1976) "Hot Pursuit" clause made, meaning evidence is admissible if found during hot pursuit.
Miranda v Arizona → (1966) Ernesto Miranda confesses to raping a girl, but wasn't made aware of his protection in the bill of rights. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
Weeks v US → (1914) Established exclusionary rule, evidence gotten without a warrant isn't admissable in a federal court