How can we help?

You can also find more resources in our Help Center.

Critical Thinking & Logic Terms

Important terms for critical thinking and logic.
STUDY
PLAY
Categorical Proposition
A proposition that relates two classes or categories. Categorical propositions differ from a
proposition in that they are not comprised of sentences that are either true or false.
Categorical Syllogism
A syllogism in which all three statements are categorical claims/propositions. A deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms, called the major, minor, and middle
Categories
Quality and quantity are attributes of the categorical proposition.
Quality
Is either affirmative or negative.
Quantity
Is either universal or particular.
Classes
Refers to the subject term and the predicate term. The subject is the noun. The predicate describes the
subject.
Copula
Links the subject with the predicate.
Deductive Argument
An argument in which the conclusion follows necessarily or directly from the premises.
Fallacies
A defect in an argument arising from some source other than the merely false premises. Both
Inductive and deductive arguments are susceptible to fallacies.
Inductive Argument
An argument in which the conclusion follows merely probably from the premises.
Predicate Term
Something that is affirmed or denied concerning an argument of a proposition.
Proposition
The information or content of a statement. The meaning of a statement. A sentence that is
either true or false.
Quantifier
"all", "no" or "some" are quantifiers. They specify how much of the subject class is included or
excluded from the predicate class. Determines the quality of a universal proposition.
Subject Term
The part of a proposition about which a statement is made.
Syllogism
A deductive argument that consists of two premises and one conclusion.
Syllogistic Logic
Logic dealing with categorical propositions and categorical syllogisms
Soundness
The argument is valid the premises are actually true.
Validity
An argument in which the premises provide sufficient support for drawing the conclusion. This
has to do with the relationship between the premises and the conclusion. It is about a truth
value relationship between the premises and the conclusion. It's all about the logical
construction of the argument.