Like this study set? Create a free account to save it.

Sign up for an account

Already have a Quizlet account? .

Create an account

Important terms for critical thinking and logic.

Categorical Proposition

A proposition that relates two classes or categories. Categorical propositions differ from a
proposition in that they are not comprised of sentences that are either true or false.

Categorical Syllogism

A syllogism in which all three statements are categorical claims/propositions. A deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms, called the major, minor, and middle


Quality and quantity are attributes of the categorical proposition.


Is either affirmative or negative.


Is either universal or particular.


Refers to the subject term and the predicate term. The subject is the noun. The predicate describes the


Links the subject with the predicate.

Deductive Argument

An argument in which the conclusion follows necessarily or directly from the premises.


A defect in an argument arising from some source other than the merely false premises. Both
Inductive and deductive arguments are susceptible to fallacies.

Inductive Argument

An argument in which the conclusion follows merely probably from the premises.

Predicate Term

Something that is affirmed or denied concerning an argument of a proposition.


The information or content of a statement. The meaning of a statement. A sentence that is
either true or false.


"all", "no" or "some" are quantifiers. They specify how much of the subject class is included or
excluded from the predicate class. Determines the quality of a universal proposition.

Subject Term

The part of a proposition about which a statement is made.


A deductive argument that consists of two premises and one conclusion.

Syllogistic Logic

Logic dealing with categorical propositions and categorical syllogisms


The argument is valid the premises are actually true.


An argument in which the premises provide sufficient support for drawing the conclusion. This
has to do with the relationship between the premises and the conclusion. It is about a truth
value relationship between the premises and the conclusion. It's all about the logical
construction of the argument.

Please allow access to your computer’s microphone to use Voice Recording.

Having trouble? Click here for help.

We can’t access your microphone!

Click the icon above to update your browser permissions and try again


Reload the page to try again!


Press Cmd-0 to reset your zoom

Press Ctrl-0 to reset your zoom

It looks like your browser might be zoomed in or out. Your browser needs to be zoomed to a normal size to record audio.

Please upgrade Flash or install Chrome
to use Voice Recording.

For more help, see our troubleshooting page.

Your microphone is muted

For help fixing this issue, see this FAQ.

Star this term

You can study starred terms together

Voice Recording