Like this study set? Create a free account to save it.

Sign up for an account

Already have a Quizlet account? .

Create an account

Milroy v Lord

equity will not perfect an imperfect gift, treat it as a self-declaration (Jones v Lock) or assist a volunteer; Turner LJ - S must do everything necessary to be done (S 'transferred' shares by deed to L, L did not register, thus failed transfer, trust not constituted)

Re Cole

Chattel can be transferred by deed or actual delivery (plus intent)

Jones v Lock

intended absolute gift of a cheque, failed, court did not find him to be T for 'B'. (cheque not endorsed/made out to himself)

Choithram v Pagrani

expressing irrevocable intention to declare property as trust's, when S is one of several Ts, is sufficient without transfer - legal duty to transfer to the others now, SP/equity regards as done that which ought to be done/perfect the gift. rejection of 'equity vs volunteer/perfect a gift' maxim

Re Rose

share transfer effective in equity once S past point of no return:
1. Used correct method
2. No further action required by S
3. Cannot revoke the transfer / gift

Mascall v Mascall

S executed all docs, handed them to T/B, pending Land Registry - Re Rose applied

Re Fry

pre-Rose; not got Treasury approval for share transfer; trust not constituted

Pennington v Wayne

wider than Re Rose - delivery to donee not essential. Clear intent to make immediate gift (construe words accordingly - principle of benevolent construction; S and 3P become D's agent for registering the shares), third party and donee informed, clear assumption by both S and D that it was done; unconscionability test; rejection of 'equity vs volunteer' maxim. Could also be a unilateral contract, offer by Pennington, as Ada Crampton's agent

Strong v Bird

imperfect gift perfected upon appointment of D as executor on death/administrator on intestacy - immediate inter-vivos gift intended, continuing intention until death (debt forgiven, no deed or consideration)

Re James

Strong v Bird extended to property (outright gift; title deeds given to person who became administrator - thus got legal title)

Re Gonin

Strong v Bird requires continuing intention til death, and immediate gift (land promised when dead, changed mind, left cheque instead, cheque does not endure post mortem) - becoming admin did not perfect gift of land and cheque invalid

Re Freeland

Strong v Bird requires immediate gift, and for chattel this means delivery (car, still in hands of 3rd party) - Buckley J seemed to overlook this point in Re Ralli - might not be required for trust

Cain v Moon

donatio mortis causa: 3 rules (contemp, condi, deliv) (+ subject matter)

Sen v Headley

land dmc, title deeds (handed over keys to box containing the deeds = handing over dominion = "constructive delivery")

Birch v Treasury Solicitor

account dmc, essential indicia (passbook)

Re Beaumont

cheque from donor lapses on her death (not cheque payable to donor, that is still property that subsists)

Gillett v Holt

Prop estoppel; promise or assurance, repeatedly over long period (cf Pennington); detrimental reliance; range of equitable remedies

Cannon v Hartley

Covenant to settle after-acquired property is remediable at common law (damages) but not enforceable (equity cannot assist volunteer) by B when B is party to the deed / direct covenantee

Re Plumptre's Marriage Settlement

Next of kin not parties to the covenant or its consideration - no cause of action

Pullan v Koe

Marriage is consideration recognised by equity (thus enforceable) - and the covenant includes children implicitly

Tweddle v Atkinson

privity of contract applies to block suits on pre-Contracts (ROTP) Act 1999 covenants

Re Pryce

B cannot get T to sue for damages for ignored covenant to settle when B has no privity

Re Ralli's WT

Equity doesn't care how fortuitously T acquired legal title; so long as he did, equity only asks who in equity can prevent him taking absolutely (trustee of two trusts, bridged them despite no overt LT transfer to the recipient of the eq. interest)

Wilkes v Allington

DMC can function if death is from some other cause

Re Stewart

Applies Strong v Bird to perfect a gift

Please allow access to your computer’s microphone to use Voice Recording.

Having trouble? Click here for help.

We can’t access your microphone!

Click the icon above to update your browser permissions and try again


Reload the page to try again!


Press Cmd-0 to reset your zoom

Press Ctrl-0 to reset your zoom

It looks like your browser might be zoomed in or out. Your browser needs to be zoomed to a normal size to record audio.

Please upgrade Flash or install Chrome
to use Voice Recording.

For more help, see our troubleshooting page.

Your microphone is muted

For help fixing this issue, see this FAQ.

Star this term

You can study starred terms together

Voice Recording