Question types

Start with

Question limit

of 48 available terms

Advertisement Upgrade to remove ads
Print test

5 Written questions

5 Matching questions

  1. What is the definiteness requirement?
  2. Claim Terminology
  3. Means or Step Plus Function
  4. Lack of Antecedent Basis
  5. Reliance on Filing Date of Patent
  1. a The claims must particularly point out and distinctly define the metes and bounds of the subject matter that will be protected by the patent.
  2. b Although the use of the term "means" or "means for" is often a clear indication that the means or step for function rules apply, the actual determination is base coin whether the element in the claim is set forth, at least in part, by the function that it performs rather than the specific structure, material or acts that perform the function.
  3. c For claims to be entitled to the filing date of an earlier application, the description of their subject matter must meet ยง112, paragraph 1 requirements.
  4. d References in a claim to, for example, "said lever" or "the lever" when there is no previous reference in the claim to a lever creates uncertainty as to what the claim is referring to. A lack of antecedent basis results in indefiniteness, unless the scope of the claim could be reasonably ascertained by a skilled artisan.
  5. e Applicants can use whatever terms they chose for defining their invention in the claims, so long as those terms are not used in ways contrary to accepted meanings in the art. ("Oval" cannot be defined as trapezoidal.).
    The use of relative terms in claims is a factual and subjective test, not an objective test.

5 Multiple choice questions

  1. Relationship of enablement to the utility requirement: If a claim is not useful or inoperative (i.e., fails to meet the utility requirement) it necessarily fails to meet how-to-use requirement of enablement because the specification cannot show how to use a useless invention.
  2. claims should be as self-contained as possible and should not reference tables and figures unless necessary.
  3. A product-by process claim is a product claim defining the product in terms of the process that makes it. Such a claim is not inherently indefinite. However, a product and process claim in which both an apparatus and the process for using it are claimed is indefinite.
  4. 1) about
    2) essentially
    3) similar
    4) substantially
    5) type
    6) relatively
  5. A Markush group which is a way of limiting claim to the members of the group of individual elements (e.g., members "selected from the group consisting of A, B and C") is definite. [A Markush group is a way of limiting a group to a set of individual elements. A markush group is used when a genus can be defined as a group that consists of particular individuals. It's a special/alternate way of expression that selects from a group "consisting of A, B and C" (closed-ended transition phrase). This wording is used (for among other reasons) to identify elements with a common trait, and the exact language must be used.]

5 True/False questions

  1. What actions are not considered new matter?1) Rewording
    2) Making inherent function explicit
    3) making explicit material incorporated by reference not new matter


  2. EnablementThe best mode requirement is intended to ensure that the inventor does not disclose less than the most desirable form of his invention. The examiner should assume that the best mode is in fact disclosed, unless evidence arises to the contrary.


  3. Does disclosure of less than the best mode invalidate a parent?Disclosure of less than the best mode does not invalidate a parent as long as the inventor as the time of the application did not know of the better method or did not recognize its superiority.


  4. Written DescriptionA claim should not be rejected on the ground of "aggregation. (an applicant is entitled to know whether the claims are being rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101, 102, 103, or 112.


  5. Does the disclosure need to point out which of the embodiment is considered best?Disclosure of less than the best mode does not invalidate a parent as long as the inventor as the time of the application did not know of the better method or did not recognize its superiority.