How can we help?

You can also find more resources in our Help Center.

3 terms

FCC v. Pacifica

"Offensive words"
-Complaint on George Carlins words
- Pacifica: Carlins words are not obscene, was used as satire, warning was aired before performance for offensive words.
-FCC did not sanction Pacifica because of no obscene words.
- FCC: Carlin performace was not obscene but it was "Patently offensive"
May the FCC regulate a radio broadcast that is not obscene but contains "Patently offensive" words dealing with sex and excretion?

YES; Conservative
-"speech may not be suppressed simply because government or society considers it to be offensive."
-Would it be illegal if Carlin's speech was political in any way?