Like this study set? Create a free account to save it.

Sign up for an account

Already have a Quizlet account? .

Create an account

Sprange v Bernard

Where the whole thing is put on trust with the "remaining part he doesn't want" to go to somebody else, then that bit's ignored for want of certainty and the whole thing goes on trust

Palmer v Simmonds

The "bulk" of my residuary estate is void for want of certainty

Anthony v Donges

"Minimal part" is void for certainty

Re Golay

Despite uncertainty issue, courts will happily define what is a "reasonable income"

Re Goldcorp Exchange

Follows Re London Wine (shippers) in of certainty of chattels - must be identifiable.

Huner v Moss

The problematic UK case for shares - Dillon LJ says this reasoning should only apply to chattels

White v Shortall

The alternative Australian analysis for Hunter v Moss

Please allow access to your computer’s microphone to use Voice Recording.

Having trouble? Click here for help.

We can’t access your microphone!

Click the icon above to update your browser permissions and try again


Reload the page to try again!


Press Cmd-0 to reset your zoom

Press Ctrl-0 to reset your zoom

It looks like your browser might be zoomed in or out. Your browser needs to be zoomed to a normal size to record audio.

Please upgrade Flash or install Chrome
to use Voice Recording.

For more help, see our troubleshooting page.

Your microphone is muted

For help fixing this issue, see this FAQ.

Star this term

You can study starred terms together

Voice Recording