3 Written questions
3 Multiple choice questions
- Activity which interferes with the safety or convenience of a section of the general public.
- Telephone bomb hoax, business disrupted for an hour; not a wide enough sector of the public
- Birth defects to children through inhalation of harmful substances. Personal injuries are recoverable.
3 True/False questions
Ware v Garston Haulage → Driver hadn't taken reasonable steps to light lorry after he had broken down. Highway obstruction, liable.
Tate & Lyle Industries v Greater London Council → D erected ferry terminals in Thames causing silt making it hard for large vessles to dock; public suffered special damage beyond average river user. had to pay for dredging to clear water.
R v Johnson → Obscene telephone calls over a period of 5 1/2 years to 13 women, liable.