hello quizlet
Home
Subjects
Expert solutions
Create
Study sets, textbooks, questions
Log in
Sign up
Upgrade to remove ads
Only $35.99/year
Social Science
Law
Civil Law
Controlled substances part 1
Flashcards
Learn
Test
Match
Flashcards
Learn
Test
Match
Terms in this set (60)
How does the DEA determine which drugs should be classified as controlled substances?
abuse potential, dependence when abused, accepted medical use
What schedule drug is mescaline?
C1
What schedule drug is cocaine?
C2
What is the generic and schedule of Actiq?
fentanyl C2
What is the generic and schedule of Hysingla?
hydrocodone C2
What is the generic and schedule of Zohydro?
hydrocodone C2
What is the generic and schedule of Demerol?
meperidine C2
What is the generic and schedule of Nucynta?
tapentadol C2
What is the generic and schedule of Focalin?
dexmethylphenidate C2
What is the generic and schedule of Dexedrine?
dextroamphentamine C2
What is the generic and schedule of Daytrana?
methylphenidate C2
What is the generic and schedule of Syndros?
dronabinol C2
What is the schedule of levo-alpha-acetyl-methadol?
C2
What is the schedule of benzphetamine?
C3
What is the generic and schedule of Butrans?
buprenorphine C3
What is the generic and schedule of Suboxone?
buprenorphine/naloxone C3
What is the generic and schedule of Fiorcet?
butalbital C3
What is the generic and schedule of Marinol?
dronabinol C3
What is the schedule of Ketamine?
C3
What is the schedule of paregoric?
C3
What is the generic and schedule of Fycompa?
perampanel C3
What is the generic and schedule of Xyrem?
sodium oxybate C3
What is the generic and schedule of Androgel?
testosterone C3
What is the generic and schedule of Librium?
chlordiazepoxide C4
What is the generic and schedule of Onfi?
clobazam C4
What is the generic and schedule of Tranxene?
clorazepate C4
What is the generic and schedule of Diastat?
diazepam C4
What is the generic and schedule of Versed?
midazolam C4
What is the generic and schedule of Byfavo?
remimazolam C4
What is the generic and schedule of Restoril?
temazepam C4
What is the generic and schedule of Halcion?
triazolam C4
What is the generic and schedule of Lunesta?
eszopiclone C4
What is the generic and schedule of Belsomra?
suvorexant C4
What is the generic and schedule of Sonata?
Zaleplon C4
What is the generic and schedule of Zolpimist?
Zolpidem C4
What is the generic and schedule of Adpipex?
phentermine C4
What is the generic and schedule of Qsymia?
phentermine/topiramate C4
What is the generic and schedule of Nuvigil?
armodafinil C4
What is the generic and schedule of Stadol?
butorphanol C4
What is the generic and schedule of Soma?
carisoprodol C4
What is the generic and schedule of Provigil?
Modafinil C4
What is the schedule of codeine syrup products?
C5
What is the generic and schedule of Lomotil?
diphenoxylate atropine C5
What is the generic and schedule of Vimpat?
lacosamide C5
What is the generic and schedule of Lyrica?
pregabalin C5
What are the requirements for a pharmacy after the DEA changes a drugs schedule?
a pharmacy must complete inventory on the date the drug changes schedules
What is the schedule of single entity oral pentobarbital and secobarbital?
C2
What is the schedule of pentobarbital and secobarbital suppository?
C3
What is the schedule of pentobarbital or secobarbital combination products with other non controlled substances?
C3
What is the schedule of Fiorinal?
C3
What is the schedule of phenobarbital?
C4
What is the schedule of Fioricet?
non controlled federally C3 indiana
What is the schedule of codeine combination tablets?
C3
What is the schedule of codeine alone?
C2
What is the no more than quantity limit for schedule 3 drugs?
1.8g codeine per 100mL or 90mg per dosage unit or 50mg morphine per 100mL
What is the no more than quantity for schedule 5 drugs?
200mg codeine per 100mL OR 100mg dihydrocodeine per 100mL or 2.5mg diphenoxylate and not less than 25mcg atropine per dosage unit
What percent THC is required for a plant to be considered hemp?
<0.3%
What schedule is Epidiolex?
non controlled
Where can CBD not be used?
dietary supplements and food additives
What is the generic and schedule of Cesamet?
nabilone C2
Sets found in the same folder
Federal Law Pharmacy Laws and Regulations
57 terms
Pharmacy Operations
47 terms
Pharmacy Practice
74 terms
Compounding
69 terms
Other sets by this creator
OTC Products
17 terms
Controlled substances part 3
53 terms
Controlled substances part 2
38 terms
IBD
28 terms
Verified questions
economics
True or False: If the real minimum attractive rate of return is 8%, inflation is 4%, and the tax rate is 40%, then money should not be borrowed if the interest rate on the loan is greater than 18%.
psychology
Which division of the nervous system enables a person to move the muscles necessary to walk down the street? a. Central nervous system. b. Sympathetic. c. Parasympathetic. d. Somatic e. Endocrine.
economics
You rent an apartment for $550 per month, payable at the beginning of the month. An initial deposit of$450 is required. Utilities are an additional $150 per month payable at the end of the month. The deposit is refundable at the time you move out, assuming a clean apartment in good condition. Draw a monthly cash flow diagram, assuming you keep the apartment for 12 full months.
politics of the united states
The Law School Admissions Case Barbara Grutter was a $49$-year-old white mother of two and resident of Michigan who ran her own consulting firm when she applied to the University of Michigan Law School in $1996$. She had a $3.8$ grade point average and scored in the $85$ th percentile on the law school admissions test but was not accepted. She sued the law school in federal court, arguing that the law school had discriminated against her because of her race and had denied her equal protection of the law. Grutter objected to the admissions policy, which gave applicants belonging to certain underrepresented racial groups a better chance of getting in than white students with the same credentials. The University of Michigan Law School is highly competitive, admitting only $10$ percent of its applicants. Its admissions policy focuses on academic ability and a flexible assessment of the applicant's individual talents, experiences, and potential to contribute to law school life and diversity. Diversity is not defined solely in terms of race, but the policy does reaffirm the law school's commitment to achieving a critical mass of African American, Hispanic, and Native American students. Barbara Grutter won her case before the federal court of appeals, and the university appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Undergraduate Admissions Case Jennifer Gratz, a white suburban resident of Michigan, applied for undergraduate admission to the University of Michigan in $1995$. Although she met the entrance standards of the university, she was denied admission. The admissions process used a scoring system due to the large number of applications, assigning points to applicants based on high school courses and grades, standardized test scores, a personal essay, geographic diversity, special talents (athletic, musical, etc.), whether the applicant was the child of an alumnus, leadership, and race. This system automatically awarded $20$ points toward the total $150$ (a score of $100$ was generally required for admission) to students from underrepresented racial groups such as African Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans. Virtually every qualified applicant from these groups has been admitted under this scoring system. Gratz also sued the university in federal court, but lost. She appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court Decides the Two Cases Because the issues of diversity and affirmative action in higher education are so important and because federal courts of appeals had issued conflicting decisions, the Supreme Court granted certiorari and agreed to hear both Michigan cases in $2003$ . In analyzing both cases the justices agreed that racial discrimination was involved and that the Court had to apply strict judicial scrutiny. The state had to show a compelling governmental interest in the use of race and that race could be used to further that interest only if it did not unduly burden the disfavored groups. For example, a race-conscious admissions program cannot use a quota system that sets aside a certain number of places in the entering class for members from selected underrepresented racial groups, although race or ethnicity could be considered a "plus" in a particular applicant's file. A majority of the justices agreed that student body diversity is a compelling state interest that can justify using race in university admissions. In a $5$-to-$4$ opinion, the Court found that Michigan's law school admissions policy did not violate Barbara Grutter's rights. Having a critical mass (essential number) of students from underrepresented groups can enrich classroom discussion, produce cross-racial understanding, and break down racial stereotypes. Rather than emphasizing diversity as justified by past or present discrimination, the Court's opinion in the law school case looked to the future challenges the nation faces: "... because universities, and in particular, law schools, represent the training ground for a large number of the Nation's leaders, the path to leadership must be visibly open to talented and qualified individuals of every race and ethnicity." The Court also noted that "the Law School engaged in a highly individualized, holistic view of each applicant's file, giving serious consideration to all the ways an applicant might contribute to a diverse educational environment." Four justices dissented in the law school case, believing that the "critical mass" notion was simply a disguise for an illegal quota. To the dissenters, the Constitution's prohibition against racial discrimination protects white people as well as members of underrepresented groups. They also believed there were nondiscriminatory ways to achieve diversity. In contrast, Michigan's undergraduate admissions policy was found unconstitutional by a vote of $6$ to $3$ . The majority objected to the program's failure to consider applicants on an individual basis as required by the Court's $1978$ Bakke decision. While the undergraduate admissions program could use race-conscious affirmative action, it had to be individualized and not mechanical. The dissenters would have allowed the use of automatic points to achieve diversity because it was an honest, open approach to the role race plays in the admissions process. Assume that African Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans make up $30$ percent of the high school students in your state but only $12$ percent of the undergraduates enrolled at your state's top public university. How would you advise the university's president to address this situation ? Explain.
Recommended textbook solutions
Myers' Psychology for AP
2nd Edition
•
ISBN: 9781464113079
David G Myers
901 solutions
Social Psychology
10th Edition
•
ISBN: 9780134700724
Elliot Aronson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers, Timothy D. Wilson
525 solutions
The Cultural Landscape: An Introduction to Human Geography, AP Edition
13th Edition
•
ISBN: 9780135165966
James M. Rubenstein
216 solutions
Fundamentals of Engineering Economic Analysis
1st Edition
•
ISBN: 9781118414705
David Besanko, Mark Shanley, Scott Schaefer
215 solutions
Other Quizlet sets
Human Phys. Exam 3
161 terms
Chapter 14: Adolescence: Biosocial (Physical) Deve…
19 terms
quiz 14 and 15
50 terms
Driver's Ed Chapt. 6 & 7
18 terms