Try the fastest way to create flashcards
hello quizlet
Home
Subjects
Expert Solutions
Log in
Sign up
Arts and Humanities
Philosophy
Philosophy final
Flashcards
Learn
Test
Match
Q-Chat
Get a hint
T/F: Functionalism posits the existence of an immaterial substance.
Click the card to flip 👆
False
Click the card to flip 👆
1 / 128
1 / 128
Flashcards
Learn
Test
Match
Q-Chat
Created by
ramanon
Share
Share
Students also viewed
EDU 206 Exam 1
171 terms
Theology CST Unit 1
23 terms
ap lang 1984 vocab and lit devices
48 terms
SpED final exam
60 terms
fallacies
11 terms
Philosophy Midterm (Fallacies of Relevance)
20 terms
Philosophy Final (Humanities III)
92 terms
Philosophy Test 1
30 terms
Castro final exam 101
78 terms
Health Psychology
143 terms
lecture 12: confucian
27 terms
chapter 5
34 terms
Terms in this set (128)
T/F: Functionalism posits the existence of an immaterial substance.
False
Cartesian dualism posits
a body and a mind.
Descartes believed that interaction between body and mind took place in
the pineal gland.
Descartes says that the mind is distinct from the body and
can exist without the body.
The existence of a form of mental illness known as multiple personality disorder seems to suggest that
the mind is divisible.
The theory that says mental states are nothing but brain states is known as
identity theory.
The view that we consist of two distinct substances (body and mind) and that these two interact is known as
substance dualism.
T/F: Descartes believes that consciousness must reside in the heart.
False
T/F: Qualitative content is a problem for functionalism.
True
T/F: Nagel believes that knowledge of what it is like to be a bat can be acquired through scientific investigation.
False
According to Fodor, in the functionalist view the psychology of a system depends not on the stuff it is made of but on
how the stuff is put together.
According to Searle, the appropriately programmed computer
cannot have cognitive states.
Block's Chinese brain argument is meant to show that functionalism
is false
Searle argues that the Chinese room thought experiment shows that
the claims of strong AI are not plausible.
Searle asserts that no computer program by itself, however sophisticated, is sufficient for
intentionality
See more