American Law

Which case set the precedent that a school does not require probable cause, but only reasonable suspicion, in order to search a student and their belongings if its believed that they have violated a school rule or the law
Click the card to flip 👆
1 / 33
Terms in this set (33)
Which case set the precedent that a school does not require probable cause, but only reasonable suspicion, in order to search a student and their belongings if its believed that they have violated a school rule or the law
New Jersey v. TLO
Which of the following cases involve students' rights to free speech in schools?

A. Tinker V Des Moines
B. Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier
C. Engle v. Vitale
D. A and B only
E. All of these cases involved students' right to free speech in school
D
Which case involved the 1st Amendment?

A. New York Times Co. v. United States
B. Schenck v. United states
C. Citizens United V. Federal Election Comission
A, B and C all involved the 1st Amendment
In Korematsu V. United States(1944), the Supreme Court ruled:
6-3 in favor of the US
Plessy v. Ferguson (_____) involved ____________ and resulted in _____________.
1896, the "separate but equal" precedent a 7-1 decision in favor of Ferguson
Which of the following Cases resulted in US citizens beginning to think of themselves as Americans first, and residents of their state, second?

A. Gibbons v. Ogden
B. McCullock v. Maryland
C. United States v. Nixon
D. Wisconsin v. Yoder
E. Dred Scott v. Standford
B
In Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, the Supreme Court ruled __________ the school and in Tinker v. Des Moines the court ruled _____________.
In favor of, against the school
The Commerce Clause was involved in both of these two court cases.
Gibbons v. Ogden and United States v. Lopez
Which of the following cases established the principles of judicial review in the United States
Marbury v. Madison
This case simultaneously strengthened 1st amendment rights are limited the power of presidency.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
This case included a majority opinion which states that "... our holding that the exclusionary rule is an essential part of both the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments is not only the logical dictate of prior cases, but it also makes very good sense. There is no war between the Constitution and common sense." Which of the following cases is being referenced aboveMapp v. OhioThis case involved a man who filled a suit claiming that his 2nd and 14th amendment rights had been violated when he was prohibiting from owing a firearm for protection.McDonald v. ChicagoThe Korematsu case pertained to which of the following historical events?Japanese interment camp in the US during World War IIIn a 5-4 decision, Chief Justice Warren wrote the majority opinion for this case, which included the following quote: "The Fifth Amendment privilege's is so fundamental to our system of constitutional rule...the defendant was aware of his rights without a warning being given... The warning of the right to remain silent must be accompanied by the explanation that anything said can and will be used against the individual in court."Miranda v. ArizonaGibbons v. Ogden(1824) resulted in which decision by the Supreme Court.7-0 in favor of GibbonsThis 1973 landmark ruling saw the Supreme Court address the constitutionality of abortion laws. The court rules 7-2 that:Abortions would be permitted during the first trimester of pregnancy onlyThis case surrounded information related to the Watergate Scandal and resulted in the reignition of a president prior to being impeached formally after an 8-0 unanimous Supreme Court decisionUnited States v. NixonGiven the case listed below, match it with the concept that applies to it most closely. Concepts may be used more than once (for different cases) or not at all: Texas v. Johnson"Symbolic speech"Given the case listed below, match it with the concept that applies to it most closely. Concepts may be used more than once (for different cases) or not at all: Regents of the Univ. of Calif. v. BakkeRacial quotas in admissionsGiven the case listed below, match it with the concept that applies to it most closely. Concepts may be used more than once (for different cases) or not at all: Shaw V. RenoRacial GerrymanderingGiven the case listed below, match it with the concept that applies to it most closely. Concepts may be used more than once (for different cases) or not at all: Tinker v Des Moines"Symbolic speech"Given the case listed below, match it with the concept that applies to it most closely. Concepts may be used more than once (for different cases) or not at all: Baker v. CarrRacial GerrymanderingGiven the case listed below, match it with the concept that applies to it most closely. Concepts may be used more than once (for different cases) or not at all: Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionCampaign financeGiven the case listed below, match it with the concept that applies to it most closely. Concepts may be used more than once (for different cases) or not at all: United States v. LopezState vs. Federal government legislative enforcementGiven the case listed below, match it with the concept that applies to it most closely. Concepts may be used more than once (for different cases) or not at all: Gideon v. WainwrightThe right to counsel (an attorney)Given the case listed below, match it with the concept that applies to it most closely. Concepts may be used more than once (for different cases) or not at all: Wisconsin v. YoderCompulsory education and freedom of religionGiven the case listed below, match it with the concept that applies to it most closely. Concepts may be used more than once (for different cases) or not at all: McCullock v. MarylandCampaign financeThere have been a series of cases, which affirmed the fact that students are afforded(given) _______ rights in school versus the outside world.LimitedObergefell v. Hodges pulled into focus which amendment of the Consitution14thWhich of the following cases were referenced in Obergefell v. Hodges decision, relating to marriage between two people of different races?Loving v. VirginiaReynolds v US brought into focus which of the followingBigamy and the 1st AmendmentWhich of the following cases did not address students rights to free speech (1st amendment)?New Jersey v. TLOThis landmark case referenced a prior case, Plessy v Ferguson, yet instead of reaffirming "separate but equal", it de-segregated schools, paving the way for the Civil Rights movement of the 1950s-1960sBrown v. Board of Education