Created by
Terms in this set (37)
CTCLs represent approximately 75-80% of all
primary cutaneous lymphomas, whereas primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas (CBCLs) account for approximately 20-25%
Indolent clinical behavior
Mycosis fungoides (MF) 54
Mycosis fungoides variants
• Folliculotropic MF 6
• Pagetoid reticulosis 1
• Granulomatous slack skin <1
Primary cutaneous CD30-positive lymphoproliferative disorders
• Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (C-ALCL) 10
• Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) 16
Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL)
1
Primary cutaneous CD4-positive small/medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder¶
3
Primary cutaneous acral CD8-positive T-cell lymphoma¶
<1
primary cutaneous lymphomas, whereas primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas (CBCLs) account for approximately 20-25%
Indolent clinical behavior
Mycosis fungoides (MF) 54
Mycosis fungoides variants
• Folliculotropic MF 6
• Pagetoid reticulosis 1
• Granulomatous slack skin <1
Primary cutaneous CD30-positive lymphoproliferative disorders
• Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (C-ALCL) 10
• Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) 16
Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL)
1
Primary cutaneous CD4-positive small/medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder¶
3
Primary cutaneous acral CD8-positive T-cell lymphoma¶
<1
Diagnosis
The first step in the evaluation of a patient suspected of having CTCL is to decide if it represents a lymphoma or a benign condition. Skin biopsies - preferably deep punch biopsies 4-6 mm wide or an excisional or incisional biopsy from the most representative skin lesions - should be performed. In the US, broad saucerizations are also done for suspected patch/plaque stage MF.
Since prior treatment with topical corticosteroids or PUVA may change the original histology profoundly, biopsies from untreated skin lesions are preferred. Even if an adequate biopsy specimen is obtained, a definite diagnosis is not always possible. First, several types of CTCL, such as MF, are often preceded for years by skin lesions that are neither clinically nor histologically diagnostic. The gradual progression from this prediagnostic phase to overt lymphoma explains why it has always been so difficult to reach a consensus on the minimal histologic criteria needed for an unequivocal diagnosis of MF6. Because of the indolent clinical behavior of the disease in such patients, a conservative approach is justified. In most cases, repeated biopsies, when appropriate, will ultimately result in the correct diagnosis.
Secondly, atypical T-cell infiltrates are found not only in CTCL but also in reactive conditions, e.g. lymphomatoid drug eruptions (pseudo-T-cell lymphomas)7. Therefore, a definite diagnosis should always be based on a combination of clinical, histologic and, in most cases, immunophenotypical criteria, and it may be supplemented with the results of gene rearrangement analysis
The first step in the evaluation of a patient suspected of having CTCL is to decide if it represents a lymphoma or a benign condition. Skin biopsies - preferably deep punch biopsies 4-6 mm wide or an excisional or incisional biopsy from the most representative skin lesions - should be performed. In the US, broad saucerizations are also done for suspected patch/plaque stage MF.
Since prior treatment with topical corticosteroids or PUVA may change the original histology profoundly, biopsies from untreated skin lesions are preferred. Even if an adequate biopsy specimen is obtained, a definite diagnosis is not always possible. First, several types of CTCL, such as MF, are often preceded for years by skin lesions that are neither clinically nor histologically diagnostic. The gradual progression from this prediagnostic phase to overt lymphoma explains why it has always been so difficult to reach a consensus on the minimal histologic criteria needed for an unequivocal diagnosis of MF6. Because of the indolent clinical behavior of the disease in such patients, a conservative approach is justified. In most cases, repeated biopsies, when appropriate, will ultimately result in the correct diagnosis.
Secondly, atypical T-cell infiltrates are found not only in CTCL but also in reactive conditions, e.g. lymphomatoid drug eruptions (pseudo-T-cell lymphomas)7. Therefore, a definite diagnosis should always be based on a combination of clinical, histologic and, in most cases, immunophenotypical criteria, and it may be supplemented with the results of gene rearrangement analysis
Immunophenotyping
Immunohistochemical studies on paraffin or frozen sections using antibodies reactive with cell-surface or cytoplasmic molecules are extremely important in the diagnosis and classification of cutaneous lymphomas. Nowadays, antigen retrieval techniques allow immunophenotyping on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections, eliminating the need for frozen sections. By using a panel of such antibodies (see Ch. 0), distinction can be made between neoplasms of T-cell, B-cell, NK-cell, and myeloid or monocytic origin. Within the group of CTCLs, such studies have contributed to the delineation of new subtypes and provided important diagnostic and prognostic criteria.
With respect to the diagnosis of CTCL, demonstration of an aberrant phenotype, i.e. loss of one or more T-cell-associated antigens, such as CD2, CD3, CD4 or CD5, by the neoplastic T cells, can be considered as an important additional criterion in establishing a definite diagnosis of CTCL8. However, loss of CD7 expression, which may be caused by SkinINchronic T-cell stimulation and is commonly observed in benign dermatoses, is not a reliable marker.
Immunohistochemical studies on paraffin or frozen sections using antibodies reactive with cell-surface or cytoplasmic molecules are extremely important in the diagnosis and classification of cutaneous lymphomas. Nowadays, antigen retrieval techniques allow immunophenotyping on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections, eliminating the need for frozen sections. By using a panel of such antibodies (see Ch. 0), distinction can be made between neoplasms of T-cell, B-cell, NK-cell, and myeloid or monocytic origin. Within the group of CTCLs, such studies have contributed to the delineation of new subtypes and provided important diagnostic and prognostic criteria.
With respect to the diagnosis of CTCL, demonstration of an aberrant phenotype, i.e. loss of one or more T-cell-associated antigens, such as CD2, CD3, CD4 or CD5, by the neoplastic T cells, can be considered as an important additional criterion in establishing a definite diagnosis of CTCL8. However, loss of CD7 expression, which may be caused by SkinINchronic T-cell stimulation and is commonly observed in benign dermatoses, is not a reliable marker.
T-cell receptor gene rearrangement analysis
T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangement analysis, utilizing a standardized assay (e.g. BIOMED-2), may provide useful information for the diagnosis and staging of malignant lymphomas9. However, caution is warranted in interpreting the results of such analyses. Clonal T-cell populations have been detected not only in skin lesions, lymph nodes, and peripheral blood of patients with CTCL and in cases of chronic dermatitis preceding MF ("clonal dermatitis"; see Ch. 9), but also in skin lesions of patients with apparently benign conditions, such as pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta, lichen planus, lichen sclerosus and some pseudolymphomas10.
Demonstration of clonal T-cell populations can therefore not be used as an absolute criterion of malignancy, but should always be considered in conjunction with clinical and histologic features, which together remain the "gold standard". If the clinical and histologic findings are not consistent, and an aberrant phenotype is not detected, a definite diagnosis of CTCL should not be made. In the future, high-throughput TCR sequencing may be used to enhance detection of T-cell clones in patients with CTCL and for distinguishing CTCL from benign inflammatory diseases
T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangement analysis, utilizing a standardized assay (e.g. BIOMED-2), may provide useful information for the diagnosis and staging of malignant lymphomas9. However, caution is warranted in interpreting the results of such analyses. Clonal T-cell populations have been detected not only in skin lesions, lymph nodes, and peripheral blood of patients with CTCL and in cases of chronic dermatitis preceding MF ("clonal dermatitis"; see Ch. 9), but also in skin lesions of patients with apparently benign conditions, such as pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta, lichen planus, lichen sclerosus and some pseudolymphomas10.
Demonstration of clonal T-cell populations can therefore not be used as an absolute criterion of malignancy, but should always be considered in conjunction with clinical and histologic features, which together remain the "gold standard". If the clinical and histologic findings are not consistent, and an aberrant phenotype is not detected, a definite diagnosis of CTCL should not be made. In the future, high-throughput TCR sequencing may be used to enhance detection of T-cell clones in patients with CTCL and for distinguishing CTCL from benign inflammatory diseases
Step one: Based on a combination of clinical, histologic and immunophenotypical criteria, distinction is first made between classic MF, MF variants, and SS on the one hand and CTCL other than these conditions on the other. The rationale for this first step is that dermatologists are familiar with the former set of
conditions, which comprise approximately 65% of CTCLs, and these lymphomas require a different clinical approach in terms of staging and therapy compared to the other forms of CTCL.
Step two: The second category to be considered is the group of primary cutaneous CD30-positive lymphoproliferative disorders. It implies that evaluation of skin biopsies from patients with (suspected) CTCL should always include CD30 immunostaining.
This group includes cases of cutaneous ALCL (C-ALCL) and LyP, which together represent the second most common group of CTCL (see Table 120.1). Patients within this spectrum of disease generally have an excellent prognosis, and most individuals can be managed easily by dermatologists.
conditions, which comprise approximately 65% of CTCLs, and these lymphomas require a different clinical approach in terms of staging and therapy compared to the other forms of CTCL.
Step two: The second category to be considered is the group of primary cutaneous CD30-positive lymphoproliferative disorders. It implies that evaluation of skin biopsies from patients with (suspected) CTCL should always include CD30 immunostaining.
This group includes cases of cutaneous ALCL (C-ALCL) and LyP, which together represent the second most common group of CTCL (see Table 120.1). Patients within this spectrum of disease generally have an excellent prognosis, and most individuals can be managed easily by dermatologists.
Step three: With the first two steps, approximately 90% of CTCL will be classified correctly. The remaining group (10% of patients) contains rare types of CTCL, including subcutaneous panniculitislike T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL), extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type, and the broad group of primary cutaneous peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), not otherwise specified (NOS). From the latter group, primary cutaneous CD8-positive aggressive epidermotropic cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma, primary cutaneous CD4-positive small/medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder, and primary cutaneous acral CD8-positive T-cell lymphoma have been separated out as provisional entities (see Table 120.1).
In the WHO-EORTC classification, the term PTCL, NOS is maintained for remaining cases that do not fit into any of the provisional entities.
Apart from SPTCL, primary cutaneous CD4-positive small/ medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder, and primary cutaneous acral CD8-positive T-cell lymphoma, lymphomas included in this third category have an aggressive clinical course, and they should be treated by, or in close collaboration with, a hemato-oncologist. It should be emphasized that because of overlapping clinicopathologic features and highly aberrant
phenotypes, distinction between these different types of aggressive CTCL is sometimes very difficult. Distinction between primary and secondary cutaneous involvement is less important than in other types of cutaneous lymphoma in that patients presenting
with only skin lesions generally develop extracutaneous disease within a short period of time and have a poor prognosis as well.
In the WHO-EORTC classification, the term PTCL, NOS is maintained for remaining cases that do not fit into any of the provisional entities.
Apart from SPTCL, primary cutaneous CD4-positive small/ medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder, and primary cutaneous acral CD8-positive T-cell lymphoma, lymphomas included in this third category have an aggressive clinical course, and they should be treated by, or in close collaboration with, a hemato-oncologist. It should be emphasized that because of overlapping clinicopathologic features and highly aberrant
phenotypes, distinction between these different types of aggressive CTCL is sometimes very difficult. Distinction between primary and secondary cutaneous involvement is less important than in other types of cutaneous lymphoma in that patients presenting
with only skin lesions generally develop extracutaneous disease within a short period of time and have a poor prognosis as well.
Apart from CTCL, a term preferably used only for primary CTCL, systemic T-cell lymphomas frequently present or relapse in the skin. Adequate staging procedures are required to differentiate between CTCL and these systemic lymphomas secondarily involving the skin. The extent of staging procedures is dependent on the type of (suspected) CTCL, and, in the case of classic MF, on the clinical stage of the disease12. In cases of early patch/plaque stage MF, unequivocal cases of LyP, and probably pagetoid reticulosis as well, staging procedures are generally not worthwhile. In cases of suspected SS, adequate staging with special emphasis on assessment of peripheral blood involvement by cytology, immunophenotyping (flow cytometry), and TCR gene rearrangement analysis is essential. In all other types of CTCL, routine hematologic staging, including complete and differential blood cell counts, a serum chemistry panel, computed tomographic (CT) scans and/or positron emission tomography (PET) of the chest and abdomen, and bone marrow sampling, are required
Definition
Mycosis fungoides (MF) represents the most common type of CTCL and accounts for ~50% of all primary cutaneous lymphomas (see Table 120.1). The term MF should be restricted to the classic "Alibert-Bazin" type characterized by the typical evolution of patches, plaques and tumors, or for clinicopathologic variants showing a similar clinical course.
Epidemiology
MF has an incidence of about 0.4 per 100 000 inhabitants per year in the US14. MF typically affects older adults (median age at diagnosis: 55-60 years), but it may occur in children and adolescents as well. Men are affected more often than women, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.6-2.0 : 1.
Pathogenesis
The etiology and the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in the development and stepwise progression of MF are largely unknown. Genetic, environmental, and immunologic factors have all been considered.
Genetic factors
Lymphomagenesis is considered to be a multifactorial process, in which a stepwise accumulation of genetic abnormalities may result in clonal proliferation, malignant transformation and, ultimately, progressive and widely disseminated disease. Although the successive clinical steps of tumor progression were described more than a century ago, the molecular events underlying the different steps of tumor progression have not been identified. Gene expression studies of early stage MF revealed overexpression of TOX, which may turn out to be a useful diagnostic marker15,15a. Several studies on tumor stage MF, using array-based comparative genomic hybridization, reported the same recurrent genetic aberrations including gains of chromosome 7p22-21 (45%), 7q21-22 (55%), 8q24 (35%) and 17q21 (40%) and losses of 9p21.3 (40%) and 13q14 (30%)16-18. Loss of 9p21.3, which harbors the CDKN2A, CDKN2B and MTAP tumor suppressor genes, has been associated with a shorter survival in patients with tumor stage MF16,17,19. In addition, constitutive activation of the NF-κB pathway in MF has been observed and may be explained in part by downregulation of NFKBIZ, an inhibitor of this pathway20,21. Whole-genome DNA sequencing has also implicated NF-κB signaling in CTCL pathogenesis22. Of note, somatic copy variants comprised 92% of driver mutations.
Mycosis fungoides (MF) represents the most common type of CTCL and accounts for ~50% of all primary cutaneous lymphomas (see Table 120.1). The term MF should be restricted to the classic "Alibert-Bazin" type characterized by the typical evolution of patches, plaques and tumors, or for clinicopathologic variants showing a similar clinical course.
Epidemiology
MF has an incidence of about 0.4 per 100 000 inhabitants per year in the US14. MF typically affects older adults (median age at diagnosis: 55-60 years), but it may occur in children and adolescents as well. Men are affected more often than women, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.6-2.0 : 1.
Pathogenesis
The etiology and the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in the development and stepwise progression of MF are largely unknown. Genetic, environmental, and immunologic factors have all been considered.
Genetic factors
Lymphomagenesis is considered to be a multifactorial process, in which a stepwise accumulation of genetic abnormalities may result in clonal proliferation, malignant transformation and, ultimately, progressive and widely disseminated disease. Although the successive clinical steps of tumor progression were described more than a century ago, the molecular events underlying the different steps of tumor progression have not been identified. Gene expression studies of early stage MF revealed overexpression of TOX, which may turn out to be a useful diagnostic marker15,15a. Several studies on tumor stage MF, using array-based comparative genomic hybridization, reported the same recurrent genetic aberrations including gains of chromosome 7p22-21 (45%), 7q21-22 (55%), 8q24 (35%) and 17q21 (40%) and losses of 9p21.3 (40%) and 13q14 (30%)16-18. Loss of 9p21.3, which harbors the CDKN2A, CDKN2B and MTAP tumor suppressor genes, has been associated with a shorter survival in patients with tumor stage MF16,17,19. In addition, constitutive activation of the NF-κB pathway in MF has been observed and may be explained in part by downregulation of NFKBIZ, an inhibitor of this pathway20,21. Whole-genome DNA sequencing has also implicated NF-κB signaling in CTCL pathogenesis22. Of note, somatic copy variants comprised 92% of driver mutations.
Environmental factors
Persistent antigenic stimulation has been demonstrated to play a crucial role in the development of various malignant lymphomas, including mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas (Helicobacter pylori infection), CBCL (Borrelia burgdorferi infection), and enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma (celiac disease). In MF, persistent antigenic stimulation has also been proposed as an initial event, but the nature of the antigen(s) involved is unknown. Large case-control studies have suggested a relationship with industrial or environmental exposures, but their role in the development of MF remains controversial23. Whereas the etiologic roles of human T-cell leukemia virus 1 (human T-cell lymphotropic virus 1; HTLV-1) in adult T-cell leukemia/ lymphoma and EBV in nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma have been firmly established, conclusive evidence for a primary etiologic role of these viruses in MF is lacking24.
Immunologic factors
CD8+ cytotoxic T cells (CTL) are thought to play a crucial role in the antitumor response in MF. A relationship between high percentages of CD8+ CTL in the dermal infiltrates and improved survival has been described25. These CD8+ T cells exert their antitumor effect both by a direct cytotoxic effect and by the production of cytokines, particularly interferon (IFN)-γ. They can mediate tumor cell lysis via exocytosis of cytotoxic granules containing perforin, granzymes and T-cell-restricted intracellular antigen (TIA-1), and by expression of Fas ligand (FasL), which interacts with Fas (CD95; APO-1) on the neoplastic T cells23. Both pathways ultimately lead to activation of caspase 3 and tumor cell death. Loss of Fas expression or function by the neoplastic T cells is one of the many mechanisms by which tumor cells can escape from an effective antitumor response26.
The neoplastic T cells in SS and tumor stage MF are derived from CD4+ T cells with a Th2 cytokine profile (production of IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10), whereas the cytotoxic T cells are the main producers of IFN-γ, which plays an important role in augmenting T-cell- and NK-cell-mediated killing. In accordance with this concept, a gradual shift from a predominantly type 1 cytokine profile in MF plaques to a predominantly type 2 cytokine profile in MF tumors has been suggested. Increased levels of Th2 cytokines may impair the Th1 cell-mediated antitumor response and contribute to the immunosuppression seen in patients with advanced MF
Persistent antigenic stimulation has been demonstrated to play a crucial role in the development of various malignant lymphomas, including mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas (Helicobacter pylori infection), CBCL (Borrelia burgdorferi infection), and enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma (celiac disease). In MF, persistent antigenic stimulation has also been proposed as an initial event, but the nature of the antigen(s) involved is unknown. Large case-control studies have suggested a relationship with industrial or environmental exposures, but their role in the development of MF remains controversial23. Whereas the etiologic roles of human T-cell leukemia virus 1 (human T-cell lymphotropic virus 1; HTLV-1) in adult T-cell leukemia/ lymphoma and EBV in nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma have been firmly established, conclusive evidence for a primary etiologic role of these viruses in MF is lacking24.
Immunologic factors
CD8+ cytotoxic T cells (CTL) are thought to play a crucial role in the antitumor response in MF. A relationship between high percentages of CD8+ CTL in the dermal infiltrates and improved survival has been described25. These CD8+ T cells exert their antitumor effect both by a direct cytotoxic effect and by the production of cytokines, particularly interferon (IFN)-γ. They can mediate tumor cell lysis via exocytosis of cytotoxic granules containing perforin, granzymes and T-cell-restricted intracellular antigen (TIA-1), and by expression of Fas ligand (FasL), which interacts with Fas (CD95; APO-1) on the neoplastic T cells23. Both pathways ultimately lead to activation of caspase 3 and tumor cell death. Loss of Fas expression or function by the neoplastic T cells is one of the many mechanisms by which tumor cells can escape from an effective antitumor response26.
The neoplastic T cells in SS and tumor stage MF are derived from CD4+ T cells with a Th2 cytokine profile (production of IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10), whereas the cytotoxic T cells are the main producers of IFN-γ, which plays an important role in augmenting T-cell- and NK-cell-mediated killing. In accordance with this concept, a gradual shift from a predominantly type 1 cytokine profile in MF plaques to a predominantly type 2 cytokine profile in MF tumors has been suggested. Increased levels of Th2 cytokines may impair the Th1 cell-mediated antitumor response and contribute to the immunosuppression seen in patients with advanced MF
Sets found in the same folder
Other sets by this creator
Other Quizlet sets
1/3