Kolm valitsetuse ideaaltüüpi.

Missugused on kolme valitsetuse ideaaltüübi - hierarhia, turg, võrgustik - eristuvad toimeloogikad?
Click the card to flip 👆
1 / 7
Terms in this set (7)
Missugused on kolme valitsetuse ideaaltüübi - hierarhia, turg, võrgustik - eristuvad toimeloogikad?
Lk 45: The three ideal-typical styles of governance are internally consistent: they each have a clear and distinct internal logic. Hierarchy produces legal instruments because they can be controlled hierarchically. A typical network governance outcome like a consensus builds on mutual trust, not on hierarchical power play, and therefore does not fit into the logic of hierarchical thinking, nor in the competitive logic of market governance.
Mis on prügikastimudel?
Lk 50: The 'garbage can' model presented by Cohen et al. in 1972 defines an organisation as "a collection of choices looking for problems, issues and feelings looking for decisions and situations in which they might be aired, solutions looking for issues to which they might be the answer, and decision makers looking for work".
Kirjelda prügikastimudelit kolmes valitsetuse ideaaltüübis.
Image: Kirjelda prügikastimudelit kolmes valitsetuse ideaaltüübis.
Mis tüüpi suhted on omased igale ideaaltüübile?
Lk 51: A major reason why the conflict potential is high is, as mentioned before, that the three styles express different types of relations with other parties: dependency (hierarchy), interdependency (network) or independency/autonomy (market).
Nimeta viite tüüpi pingeid, mis esinevad hierarhia ja võrgustike valitsetuses?
Lk 52-52: When hierarchical ('vertical') and network ('horizontal') steering are applied at the same time by one public administration organisation, paradoxical situations appear, in which this organisation ends up in a 'split'. 1) The 'double hat' problem 2) The 'steering split' 3) The 'accountability curve' 4) 'Horizontal disguise' 5) The 'vertical reflex'
Missugused konfliktid võivad tekkida turu ja võrgustike valitsetuses?
Lk 54: Market governance has the potential to conflict with network governance on the way decisions are made. Competition in a market setting asks for quick decisions of independent actors, who strive to optimise their own interests. [...] The interdependency of actors in a network governance setting may conflict with the autonomy a market approach demands.
Kirjelda vähemalt ühte võimalust, kuidas kolme valitsetuse ideaalmudelit saaks kombineerida.
Kui mõelda ideaaltüüpidest kui protsessi eri faasidest. (lk 55: "pre-partnershop collaboration; partnership creation and consolidation; partnership termination and succession."))