hello quizlet
Home
Subjects
Expert solutions
Create
Study sets, textbooks, questions
Log in
Sign up
Upgrade to remove ads
Only $35.99/year
LL/T
Flashcards
Learn
Test
Match
Flashcards
Learn
Test
Match
Terms in this set (10)
Frobig v. Gordon (2002)
The rule in WA is that the owner, keeper, or harborer of a dangerous or vicious animal is liable; the LL of the animal holder is not liable for any harm caused by the vicious animal.
Latent or hidden defects in the leasehold
An LL is liable to a T for harm caused by (1):
harm that existed at the commencement of the leasehold
An LL is liable to a T for harm caused by (2):
harm of which the LL had actual knowledge
An LL is liable to a T for harm caused by (3):
harm of which the LL failed to inform the T.
An LL is liable to a T for harm caused by (4):
Harm that is created after the property has been leased (and the T has taken possession)
LL is not responsible to the persons injured on or off the land
LL has no duty to repair a defective condition caused by a T
RLTA of 1973
T has a duty to not permit a nuisance on their rental property
RCW 59.18.130 (5)
Does a LL have an absolute duty to protect T against foreseeable criminal acts of other third parties?
No because the LL's negligence did not cause the T's injury.
What does the dissent in Griffin v. West RS, Inc. state?
LL owes a duty to T to protect them from foreseeable criminal conduct arising out of use of spaces under the control of the LL either exclusively or jointly with the T.
Other sets by this creator
CRM LAW
124 terms
Torts
88 terms
Restatement (Second) of Contracts [Contract Interp…
25 terms
Restatement (Second) of contracts [contract format…
55 terms