5 Written questions
5 Matching questions
- Exile Paradigm
- Matthew - Date
- Testimonia Theory
- John's Relation to the Synoptic Gospels
- Solutions to the Text-Critical Issue of Mark
- a 1) vs 8 is simply the end
2) the book was never finished, something happened to prevent the ending from being written
3) the Resurrection account was planned for a second volume following Luke-Acts pattern (little evidence for this)
4) the ending was lost
5) the resurrection account was already widely known and circulated (the weakest argument)
- b -writing of OT Scripture fulfilled
-OT and Jesus' fulfillment put together in a codex
-used to debate/convince Jews of Jesus' messiah-ship
- c collapse of the Kingdom
- d 1) A supplement- John knows at least one Synoptic and adds material
2) An interpretation- writing an explanation.
3) Literary Independence** - John is writing his own gospel, not adding to or explaining the other.
- e 1 c. document for sure.
Question: before or after 70 (temple destruction)?
Liberal need the date to fall after 70 AD so Matt. put Jesus' temple prediction in his mouth
Conservatives don't care
5 Multiple choice questions
- Ch 1:1-18 - Prologue
Ch 1 - 12 - Book of Signs, exactly seven signs/miracles
Ch 13 - 20 - Book of Glory, the passion
Ch 21 - Epilogue
- -Late 50s or very early 60s
-precedes Lk and Acts
-Acts probably written before Paul's death (64) in 63, so Mk must come before this.
- -somethings just need teaching (OT sacrificial system)
-having one good translation of each approach is the way to go
- -Two volumes (the only one done intentionally)
-LXX style with a classical touch
-- Luke/Acts written like they belong to scripture already
-clearly educated and studied
5 True/False questions
Holtzmann Hypothesis → 1863
"The Incident" Paradigm → Jesus is a Joshua "type" and Joshua is a Jesus "type"
Yeshua (Joshua) in Hebrew is transliterated Jesus in Greek
means "Ywh is Salvation"
Three Themes of Luke → -non-canonical, 2nd c gnostic, pseudepigraph
-docetic depiction of the crucifixion
-9th c. copy found in a monk's coffin
-Oxyrhynncus fragments: 2nd or 3rd c.
Mark - Provence (where it was written) → Rome. The evidence:
2. Language - Mark uses Aramaic and translates it, he also transliterates Latin into Greek (so, his readers know Latin but not Aramaic)
3. Purpose of Proclamation - the cross does not prevent Christ from being the Son of God, addressing the Roman issues with the crucifixion
Mark - Structure → Three themes woven together throughout the book
"L" Material of the Infancy Narrative:
-Mtt writes about scripture fulfilled, Lk writes like he's continuing scripture
-canticles (Mary's Magnificat = Hannah's Song in I Sam)