NAME

Question types


Start with


Question limit

of 39 available terms

Print test

5 Written questions

5 Matching questions

  1. Modern Standard for PJ: Purposeful Availment - Effect of Unilateral Activity
  2. PJ - Type 2 Quasi in rem
  3. Modern Standard for PJ: International Shoe Minimum Contacts Test
  4. PJ - In personam
  5. PJ - In rem
  1. a a. P's unilateral activity of bringing product into forum doesn't satisfy minimum contacts b. D's foreseeability that product might make it into forum doesn't create jurisdiction c. D must reach out to forum to establish minimum contacts
  2. b AKA Shoe Box Test: (draw in shoe box test)
  3. c Dispute is unrelated to the property. The property is attached to assert the court's jurisdiction over the property. *must be attached at the outset (Pennoyer)
  4. d Jurisdiction over property. Can have constructive service
  5. e Jurisdiction over a person. Cannot have constructive service

5 Multiple choice questions

  1. Relationship between D and forum must not violate fair play and substantial justice/reasonableness
  2. Identify's which forum the case is to be tired in. Constitutes a waiver for PJ in that forum
  3. when given PJ is waived even if the party has no contacts with the state
  4. 1) Prior negotiations 2) Contemplated future actions 3) Terms of contract 4) Actual course of dealings
  5. 1) Intend to serve forum market 2) Design product for that market 3) Advertise in forum market 4) Establish channels for providing service in that market 5) Have designated distributor in the state

5 True/False questions

  1. Modern Standard for PJ: SOC - White Decision in Asahiif there are over 100,000 units in the SOC than Minimum contacts is met.

          

  2. Modern Standard for PJ; Purposeful Availment - 5 Reasonableness FactorsRelationship between D and forum must not violate fair play and substantial justice/reasonableness

          

  3. Original Standard for PJ: Pennoyer v. Neff rulings on in personam and in rem1. in personam = need personal service on D within forum state 2. in rem = Jurisdiction obtained by attaching property at beginning of suit

          

  4. Consent: Implied Consent (Hess v. PawloskiD, a non resident gets into an accident with P when driving in P's state. State statute says D, by driving on state roads, gave implied consent to be served through a third party in state.

          

  5. Modern Standard for PJ: Reasonableness Standard Prong (Burger King Test) 5 Factors1) Prior negotiations 2) Contemplated future actions 3) Terms of contract 4) Actual course of dealings