Related questions with answers
On learning that Sébastien planned to travel abroad, Roslyn asked him to deliver $25,000 in cash to her family in Mexico. During a customs inspection at the border, Sébastien told the customs inspector that he carried less than$10,000. The officer discovered the actual amount of cash that Sébastien was carrying, seized it, and arrested Sebastien. Roslyn asked the government to return what she claimed were her funds, arguing that the arrangement with Sébastien was a bailment and that she still held title to the cash. (See Bailments.)
(a) The first group will argue that Roslyn is entitled to the cash.
(b) The second group will take the position of the government and develop an argument that Roslyn's agreement with Sébastien does not qualify as a bailment.
(c) The third group will assume that a bailment was created, identify what type of bailment it was, and explain the degree of care required of the bailee.
Solution
VerifiedFor this item, we are asked to provide discussions on the groups' given tasks.
Create an account to view solutions
Create an account to view solutions
Recommended textbook solutions

Street Law: A Course in Practical Law
9th Edition•ISBN: 9780021429257McGraw-Hill Education
Business Law: Text and Cases
15th Edition•ISBN: 9780357129630 (1 more)Kenneth W. Clarkson, Roger LeRoy Miller

More related questions
1/4
1/7