Defenses. Niles sold Kennedy a small motorboat for $\$ 1,500$, telling Kennedy that the boat was in excellent condition. Kennedy gave Niles a check for $\$ 1,500$, which Niles indorsed and gave to Frazier for value. When Kennedy took the boat for a trial run, she discovered that the boat leaked, needed to be painted, and required a new motor. Kennedy stopped payment on her check, which had not yet been cashed. Niles had disappeared. Can Frazier recover from Kennedy as a holder in due course? Discuss. (See Defenses and Limitations.)

Waldo makes out a negotiable promissory note payable to the order of Grace. Grace indorses the note by writing on it “Without recourse, Grace” and transfers the note for value to Adam. Adam, in need of cash, negotiates the note to Keith by indorsing it with the words “Pay to Keith, Adam.” On the due date, Keith presents the note to Waldo for payment, only to learn that Waldo has filed for bankruptcy and will have all debts (including the note) discharged. Discuss fully whether Keith can hold Waldo, Grace, or Adam liable on the note.

Based on these facts, describe any transfer or presentment warranties that Mahar may have violated.

Nancy Mahar was the office manager at Golden Years Nursing Home, Inc. She was given a signature stamp to issue checks to the nursing home's employees for up to $\$ 500$ as advances on their pay. The checks were drawn on Golden Years' account at First National Bank. Over a seven-year period, Mahar wrote a number of checks to employees exclusively for the purpose of embezzling funds for herself. She forged the employees' indorsements on the checks, signed her name as a second indorser, and deposited the checks in her personal account at Star Bank. The employees whose names were on the checks never actually requested them. When the scheme was uncovered, Golden Years filed a suit against Mahar, Star Bank, and others to recover the funds. Using the information presented in the chapter, answer the following questions.

Under the UCC, which party, Golden Years or Star Bank, must bear the loss in this situation? Why?

Nancy Mahar was the office manager at Golden Years Nursing Home, Inc. She was given a signature stamp to issue checks to the nursing home's employees for up to $\$ 500$ as advances on their pay. The checks were drawn on Golden Years' account at First National Bank. Over a seven-year period, Mahar wrote a number of checks to employees exclusively for the purpose of embezzling funds for herself. She forged the employees' indorsements on the checks, signed her name as a second indorser, and deposited the checks in her personal account at Star Bank. The employees whose names were on the checks never actually requested them. When the scheme was uncovered, Golden Years filed a suit against Mahar, Star Bank, and others to recover the funds. Using the information presented in the chapter, answer the following questions.

Based on these facts, describe any transfer or presentment warranties that Mahar may have violated.

. Under the UCC, which party, Golden Years or Star Bank, must bear the loss in this situation? Why?

What is the rule set forth by that provision?

Nancy Mahar was the office manager at Golden Years Nursing Home, Inc. She was given a signature stamp to issue checks to the nursing home's employees for up to $\$ 500$ as advances on their pay. The checks were drawn on Golden Years' account at First National Bank. Over a seven-year period, Mahar wrote a number of checks to employees exclusively for the purpose of embezzling funds for herself. She forged the employees' indorsements on the checks, signed her name as a second indorser, and deposited the checks in her personal account at Star Bank. The employees whose names were on the checks never actually requested them. When the scheme was uncovered, Golden Years filed a suit against Mahar, Star Bank, and others to recover the funds. Using the information presented in the chapter, answer the following questions.

What is the rule set forth by that provision?

With regard to signature liability, which provision of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) discussed in this chapter applies to this scenario?

The Bank-Customer Relationship. Euro International Mortgage, Inc. (EIM), held two accounts-Account $9378$ and Account $3998$-at Bank of America. Ravi Kadiyala was an authorized signatory on Account 9378 but not on Account $3998$. Through EIM, Kadiyala obtained a username and password to gain access to Account $3998$, from which he transferred $\$ 200,000$ to Account $9378$ . He then instructed the bank to issue cashier's checks against the new balance in Account $9378$. Meanwhile, Mark Pupke, an authorized signatory on both accounts, learned what Kadiyala had done and told the bank to cancel the checks and reverse the transfer. Does the bank have a duty to honor either party's request? If so, whose? Why?

Lisa Mendes and Brad Lee work in the sales department of an AT&T Wireless store. Lisa has been signing up an average of 48 new cell phone customers every month with a standard deviation of 22, while Brad signs up an average of 56 new customers with a standard deviation of 17 . The store manager offers both Lisa and Brad a $\$ 100$ incentive bonus if they can sign up more than 100 new customers in a month. Assume a normal distribution to answer the following questions.

a. What is the probability that Lisa will earn the $\$ 100$ incentive bonus?

b. What is the probability that Brad will earn the $\$ 100$ incentive bonus?

c. Are you surprised by the results? Explain.

Indorsements. Denise and Nick Purificato signed a note secured by real property in Florida. The note was transferred through several parties to Aurora Loan Services, LLC. The Purificatos defaulted on the payments. Aurora filed a suit in a Florida state court against them, seeking a judgment of foreclosure to recover the unpaid debt. While proceedings were pending, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, succeeded Aurora and became the plaintiff in the suit. At trial, Nationstar provided a screen shot of the note and an allonge, which had been imaged as a single document before Aurora filed the complaint against the Purificatos. Nationstar also provided the original note and allonge, which ended in a blank indorsement. The allonge stated that it was "affixed and a permanent part of said note." Did this evidence establish that the allonge was sufficiently affixed to the note to prove Nationstar's status as the holder with the right to enforce it? Discuss.

Suppose that the name Red Rhino Market Group, LLC, had not been included on the note. Would Evans have been personally liable for its payment? Discuss.

Angela Brock borrowed $544,000 and signed a note payable to Amerifund Mortgage Services, LLC, to buy a house in Silver Spring, Maryland. The note was indorsed in blank and transferred several times “without recourse” before Brock fell behind on the payments. On behalf of Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., BAC Home Loans Servicing LP initiated foreclosure. Brock filed an action in a Maryland state court to block it, arguing that BAC could not foreclose because Deutsche Bank, not BAC, owned the note. Can BAC enforce the note? Explain. [Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Brock, 63 A.3d 40 (Md. 2013)]