Related questions with answers
During the design and specifications development stages of a remote meter reading system for residential electricity use (a system that allows monthly usage to be transmitted via phone lines with no need to physically view meters), the two engineers working on the project for the city of Forest Ridge noted something different from what they expected. The first, an electrical/software engineer, noted that the city liaison staff member provided all the information on the software options, but only one option, the one from Lorier Software, was ever discussed and detailed. The second designer, an industrial/systems engineer, further noted that all the hardware specifications provided to them by this same liaison came from the same distributor, namely, Delsey Enterprises. Coincidently, at a weekend family picnic for city employees, to which the engineers had been invited, they met a couple named Don Delsey and Susan Lorier. Upon review, they learned that Don is the son-in-law of the city liaison and Susan is his stepdaughter. Based on these observations and before they complete the system design and specifications, what should the two engineers do, if anything, about their suspicions that the city liaison person is trying to bias the design to favor of the use of his relatives’ software and hardware businesses?
Solution
VerifiedPublic sector projects are not planned to make profits, but to do public good. This means, only the best possible alternative should be chosen, given all parameters needed in order to make a cost benefit analysis.
However, often there are cases where government of officials do not show enough integrity and are biased, which affects engineers who are engaged into program in order to provide project development strategy or other requirements asked of them.
As you can assume, there are some greedy people which are on a position to have access to public funds. Their goals, as in this case, is to make profits and abuse their position.
In a situation when engineers are engaged to provide service for public projects, they are obligated to act on the Code of Ethics for engineers while providing analysis and report. The situation defined in a problem is not different, which means that engineers can not allow for client to pressure them into scope limitation, as stated in problem. Engineer must stay impartial and must submit analysis that is not biased in any way even if it can have negative impact on future contract possibilities.
Create an account to view solutions
Create an account to view solutions
Recommended textbook solutions

Engineering Economy
7th Edition•ISBN: 9780073376301 (2 more)Anthony Tarquin, Leland Blank
Engineering Economy
8th Edition•ISBN: 9780073523439 (1 more)Anthony Tarquin, Leland Blank
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics
3rd Edition•ISBN: 9780132775427Gerald Thuesen, G Thuesen, Walter Fabrycky
Engineering Economic Analysis
13th Edition•ISBN: 9780190296902Donald G. Newnan, Jerome P. Lavelle, Ted G. EschenbachMore related questions
1/4
1/7