Related questions with answers

The U.S. Bureau of Justice released the following probabilities for those arrested for committing various felony crimes in the United States:

 Probability of Being  Crime  Prosecuted  Convicted  Jailed for >1 Year  Homicide 0.910.750.73 Assault 0.790.640.15 Burglary 0.880.810.28 Arson 0.880.720.28 Drug offenses 0.780.690.19 Weapons 0.830.700.13 Public disorder 0.920.850.12\begin{aligned} &\text { Probability of Being }\\ &\begin{array}{lccc} \text { Crime } & \text { Prosecuted } & \text { Convicted } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Jailed for } \\ >1 \text { Year } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Homicide } & 0.91 & 0.75 & 0.73 \\ \text { Assault } & 0.79 & 0.64 & 0.15 \\ \text { Burglary } & 0.88 & 0.81 & 0.28 \\ \text { Arson } & 0.88 & 0.72 & 0.28 \\ \text { Drug offenses } & 0.78 & 0.69 & 0.19 \\ \text { Weapons } & 0.83 & 0.70 & 0.13 \\ \text { Public disorder } & 0.92 & 0.85 & 0.12 \end{array} \end{aligned}

Allen has been arrested for burglary, Bill has been arrested for a weapons offense, and Charlie has been arrested on a public-disorder charge. Assuming these individuals are typical perpetrators and the decisions regarding their respective fates are unrelated, determine the probability that Source: U.S. Bureau of Justice, as reported in Sam Meddis, "Felony Arrests: Short Terms," USA Today, January 18, 1988, p. 9A.

a. Allen will be jailed for more than a year.

Question

Each of the following passages contains a single argument. Using the letters “P” and “C,” identify the premises and conclusion of each argument, writing premises first and conclusion last. List the premises in the order in which they make the most sense (usually the order in which they occur), and write both premises and conclusion in the form of separate declarative sentences. Indicator words may be eliminated once premises and conclusion have been appropriately labeled. As the denial or perversion of justice by the sentences of courts, as well as in any other manner, is with reason classed among the just causes of war, it will follow that the federal judiciary ought to have cognizance of all causes in which the citizens of other countries are concerned.

Solutions

Verified
Answered 1 year ago
Step 1
1 of 2

The premises\textbf{premises} are statements that we assume to be true (or that have been given to true). We label the premises as P1,P2,...P_1,P_2,...

A conclusion\textbf{conclusion} is a statement that is derived from the premises. That is, the conclusion needs to be true whenever all premises are true. We label the conclusion as CC.

In this case, we note that the conclusion follows "it will follow", while the premises are all statements prior to "it will follow."

PP: The denial or perversion of justice by the sentences of court is with reason classed among the just causes of war.

CC: The federal judiciary ought to have cognizance of all causes in which citizens of other countries are concerned.

Create an account to view solutions

Create an account to view solutions

Recommended textbook solutions

Advanced Engineering Mathematics 10th Edition by Erwin Kreyszig

Advanced Engineering Mathematics

10th EditionISBN: 9780470458365 (3 more)Erwin Kreyszig
4,134 solutions
Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences 3rd Edition by Mary L. Boas

Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences

3rd EditionISBN: 9780471198260Mary L. Boas
3,355 solutions
Advanced Engineering Mathematics 6th Edition by Dennis G. Zill

Advanced Engineering Mathematics

6th EditionISBN: 9781284105902 (7 more)Dennis G. Zill
5,294 solutions
A Concise Introduction to Logic 13th Edition by Lori Watson, Patrick J. Hurley

A Concise Introduction to Logic

13th EditionISBN: 9781337514781 (2 more)Lori Watson, Patrick J. Hurley
1,967 solutions

More related questions

1/4

1/7